Demographics details for Yuma, AZ vs Charlottesville, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yuma, AZ vs Charlottesville, VA.
| Data | Yuma | Charlottesville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 98,527 | 45,373 |
| Median Age | 32.0 years | 32.4 years |
| Median Income | $59,312 | $67,177 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 9.0 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Yuma vs Charlottesville
- In Yuma, the population is higher at 98,527, compared to 45,373 in Charlottesville.
- The median age in Charlottesville is higher at 32.4 years, compared to 32.0 years in Yuma.
- Charlottesville has a higher median income of $67,177, compared to $59,312 in Yuma.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Yuma at 39.0% compared to 30.0% in Charlottesville.
- Yuma has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 12% in Charlottesville.
- The unemployment rate in Yuma is higher at 9.0%, compared to 2.7% in Charlottesville.
Demographics
Demographics Yuma vs Charlottesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Yuma | Charlottesville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 18 |
| White | 13 | 63 |
| Asian | 2 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 61 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Yuma vs Charlottesville
- In Charlottesville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 2% in Yuma.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Charlottesville at 63% compared to 13% in Yuma.
- In Charlottesville, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 2% in Yuma.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Yuma at 61% compared to 6% in Charlottesville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Yuma at 21% compared to 6% in Charlottesville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Yuma at 1% compared to 0% in Charlottesville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Yuma | Charlottesville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 16.2% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yuma vs Charlottesville
- More residents in Yuma report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.4% in Charlottesville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Charlottesville at 22.4% versus 19.3% in Yuma.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Yuma at 16.2% compared to 15.0% in Charlottesville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Yuma at 17.6% compared to 16.7% in Charlottesville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Yuma at 39.5% compared to 32.9% in Charlottesville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Yuma at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Charlottesville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Yuma | Charlottesville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (1,642) | 1.1% (495) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (13,054) | 7.8% (3,550) |
| Less than High School | 19.8% (19,520) | 7.6% (3,427) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (12,116) | 38.2% (17,339) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yuma vs Charlottesville
- A higher percentage of residents in Yuma have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.1% in Charlottesville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Yuma hold a high school diploma at 13.2% compared to 7.8% in Charlottesville.
- More residents in Yuma have less than a high school education at 19.8% compared to 7.6% in Charlottesville.
- In Charlottesville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.2% compared to 12.3% in Yuma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.