Demographics details for Yucca valley, CA vs Spring park, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Yucca valley, CA vs Spring park, MN.

Data Yucca valley Spring park
Population 21,662 1,663
Median Age 39.9 years 55.5 years
Median Income $54,153 $48,684
Married Families 34.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 12% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Yucca valley vs Spring park

  • In Yucca valley, the population is higher at 21,662, compared to 1,663 in Spring park.
  • The median age in Spring park is higher at 55.5 years, compared to 39.9 years in Yucca valley.
  • Yucca valley has a higher median income of $54,153 compared to $48,684 in Spring park.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Yucca valley at 34.0% compared to 30.0% in Spring park.
  • Yucca valley has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Spring park.
  • The unemployment rate in Yucca valley is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.2% in Spring park.

Demographics

Demographics Yucca valley vs Spring park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Yucca valley Spring park
Black 4 9
White 51 82
Asian 2 2
Hispanic 25 1
Two or More Races 16 3
American Indian 2 3

Demographics Comparison: Yucca valley vs Spring park

  • In Spring park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 4% in Yucca valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Spring park at 82% compared to 51% in Yucca valley.
  • Both Yucca valley and Spring park have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Yucca valley at 25% compared to 1% in Spring park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Yucca valley at 16% compared to 3% in Spring park.
  • In Spring park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 2% in Yucca valley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Yucca valley Spring park
Mental Health Not Good 19.2% 13.4%
Physical Health Not Good 13.6% 7.1%
Depression 22.0% 23.7%
Smoking 16.7% 11.7%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 22.5%
Obesity 38.8% 26.0%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Yucca valley vs Spring park

  • More residents in Yucca valley report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 13.4% in Spring park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Spring park at 23.7% versus 22.0% in Yucca valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Yucca valley at 16.7% compared to 11.7% in Spring park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Spring park at 22.5% compared to 16.4% in Yucca valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Yucca valley at 38.8% compared to 26.0% in Spring park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Spring park at 22.0% compared to 20.0% in Yucca valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Yucca valley Spring park
No Schooling 0.9% (191) 0.5% (9)
High School Diploma 17.3% (3,754) 27.8% (463)
Less than High School 15.6% (3,383) 12.0% (200)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.4% (2,907) 29.1% (484)

Education Levels Comparison: Yucca valley vs Spring park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Yucca valley have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Spring park.
  • In Spring park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.8% compared to 17.3% in Yucca valley.
  • More residents in Yucca valley have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 12.0% in Spring park.
  • In Spring park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.1% compared to 13.4% in Yucca valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.