Demographics details for Yucca valley, CA vs Pharr, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yucca valley, CA vs Pharr, TX.
| Data | Yucca valley | Pharr |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,662 | 80,179 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 29.4 years |
| Median Income | $54,153 | $45,016 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 24% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 7.6 |
Population Comparison: Yucca valley vs Pharr
- The population in Pharr is higher at 80,179, compared to 21,662 in Yucca valley.
- Residents in Yucca valley have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 29.4 years in Pharr.
- Yucca valley has a higher median income of $54,153 compared to $45,016 in Pharr.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Yucca valley and Pharr at 34.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Pharr at 24%, compared to 12% in Yucca valley.
- Pharr has a higher unemployment rate at 7.6% compared to 5.2% in Yucca valley.
Demographics
Demographics Yucca valley vs Pharr provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Yucca valley | Pharr |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 51 | -26 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 25 | 94 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 31 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Yucca valley vs Pharr
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Yucca valley at 4% compared to 1% in Pharr.
- Yucca valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 51% compared to -26% in Pharr.
- The Asian population is larger in Yucca valley at 2% compared to 0% in Pharr.
- Pharr has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 94%, compared to 25% in Yucca valley.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pharr at 31%, compared to 16% in Yucca valley.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Yucca valley at 2% compared to 0% in Pharr.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Yucca valley | Pharr |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 16.5% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 38.8% | 45.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yucca valley vs Pharr
- More residents in Yucca valley report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.7% in Pharr.
- Depression is more prevalent in Yucca valley at 22.0% compared to 19.9% in Pharr.
- Pharr has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 16.7% in Yucca valley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Yucca valley at 16.4% compared to 15.8% in Pharr.
- Pharr has higher obesity rates at 45.4% compared to 38.8% in Yucca valley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Yucca valley at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Pharr.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Yucca valley | Pharr |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (191) | 2.1% (1,723) |
| High School Diploma | 17.3% (3,754) | 13.2% (10,587) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (3,383) | 33.7% (27,024) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (2,907) | 9.7% (7,741) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yucca valley vs Pharr
- In Pharr, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.9% in Yucca valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Yucca valley hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 13.2% in Pharr.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pharr at 33.7%, compared to 15.6% in Yucca valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Yucca valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 9.7% in Pharr.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.