Demographics details for Yucca valley, CA vs Kings mountain, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Yucca valley, CA vs Kings mountain, NC.

Data Yucca valley Kings mountain
Population 21,662 11,638
Median Age 39.9 years 41.5 years
Median Income $54,153 $45,301
Married Families 34.0% 24.0%
Poverty Level 12% 11%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 4.2

Population Comparison: Yucca valley vs Kings mountain

  • In Yucca valley, the population is higher at 21,662, compared to 11,638 in Kings mountain.
  • The median age in Kings mountain is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 39.9 years in Yucca valley.
  • Yucca valley has a higher median income of $54,153 compared to $45,301 in Kings mountain.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Yucca valley at 34.0% compared to 24.0% in Kings mountain.
  • Yucca valley has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Kings mountain.
  • The unemployment rate in Yucca valley is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.2% in Kings mountain.

Demographics

Demographics Yucca valley vs Kings mountain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Yucca valley Kings mountain
Black 4 25
White 51 68
Asian 2 2
Hispanic 25 2
Two or More Races 16 3
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Yucca valley vs Kings mountain

  • In Kings mountain, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 4% in Yucca valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Kings mountain at 68% compared to 51% in Yucca valley.
  • Both Yucca valley and Kings mountain have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Yucca valley at 25% compared to 2% in Kings mountain.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Yucca valley at 16% compared to 3% in Kings mountain.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Yucca valley at 2% compared to 0% in Kings mountain.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Yucca valley Kings mountain
Mental Health Not Good 19.2% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 13.6% 13.1%
Depression 22.0% 25.7%
Smoking 16.7% 20.9%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 16.3%
Obesity 38.8% 38.0%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Yucca valley vs Kings mountain

  • More residents in Yucca valley report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.3% in Kings mountain.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Kings mountain at 25.7% versus 22.0% in Yucca valley.
  • Kings mountain has a higher smoking rate at 20.9% compared to 16.7% in Yucca valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Yucca valley at 16.4% compared to 16.3% in Kings mountain.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Yucca valley at 38.8% compared to 38.0% in Kings mountain.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Yucca valley at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Kings mountain.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Yucca valley Kings mountain
No Schooling 0.9% (191) 0.4% (43)
High School Diploma 17.3% (3,754) 21.7% (2,528)
Less than High School 15.6% (3,383) 17.8% (2,071)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.4% (2,907) 11.6% (1,353)

Education Levels Comparison: Yucca valley vs Kings mountain

  • A higher percentage of residents in Yucca valley have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Kings mountain.
  • In Kings mountain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 17.3% in Yucca valley.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kings mountain at 17.8%, compared to 15.6% in Yucca valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Yucca valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 11.6% in Kings mountain.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.