Demographics details for Yucca valley, CA vs Harker heights, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Yucca valley, CA vs Harker heights, TX.

Data Yucca valley Harker heights
Population 21,662 34,102
Median Age 39.9 years 34.5 years
Median Income $54,153 $72,258
Married Families 34.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 12% 9%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 5.0

Population Comparison: Yucca valley vs Harker heights

  • The population in Harker heights is higher at 34,102, compared to 21,662 in Yucca valley.
  • Residents in Yucca valley have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 34.5 years in Harker heights.
  • Harker heights has a higher median income of $72,258, compared to $54,153 in Yucca valley.
  • In Harker heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 34.0% in Yucca valley.
  • Yucca valley has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Harker heights.
  • The unemployment rate in Yucca valley is higher at 5.2%, compared to 5.0% in Harker heights.

Demographics

Demographics Yucca valley vs Harker heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Yucca valley Harker heights
Black 4 28
White 51 36
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 25 21
Two or More Races 16 11
American Indian 2 1

Demographics Comparison: Yucca valley vs Harker heights

  • In Harker heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 4% in Yucca valley.
  • Yucca valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 51% compared to 36% in Harker heights.
  • In Harker heights, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Yucca valley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Yucca valley at 25% compared to 21% in Harker heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Yucca valley at 16% compared to 11% in Harker heights.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Yucca valley at 2% compared to 1% in Harker heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Yucca valley Harker heights
Mental Health Not Good 19.2% 16.5%
Physical Health Not Good 13.6% 10.8%
Depression 22.0% 22.5%
Smoking 16.7% 15.5%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 17.1%
Obesity 38.8% 37.1%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Yucca valley vs Harker heights

  • More residents in Yucca valley report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.5% in Harker heights.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Harker heights at 22.5% versus 22.0% in Yucca valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Yucca valley at 16.7% compared to 15.5% in Harker heights.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Harker heights at 17.1% compared to 16.4% in Yucca valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Yucca valley at 38.8% compared to 37.1% in Harker heights.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Yucca valley at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Harker heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Yucca valley Harker heights
No Schooling 0.9% (191) 1.3% (448)
High School Diploma 17.3% (3,754) 11.6% (3,958)
Less than High School 15.6% (3,383) 10.3% (3,509)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.4% (2,907) 18.8% (6,403)

Education Levels Comparison: Yucca valley vs Harker heights

  • In Harker heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.9% in Yucca valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Yucca valley hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 11.6% in Harker heights.
  • More residents in Yucca valley have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 10.3% in Harker heights.
  • In Harker heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 13.4% in Yucca valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.