Demographics details for Yucca valley, CA vs Fort scott, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Yucca valley, CA vs Fort scott, KS.

Data Yucca valley Fort scott
Population 21,662 7,615
Median Age 39.9 years 38.3 years
Median Income $54,153 $45,206
Married Families 34.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 12% 14%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Yucca valley vs Fort scott

  • In Yucca valley, the population is higher at 21,662, compared to 7,615 in Fort scott.
  • Residents in Yucca valley have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 38.3 years in Fort scott.
  • Yucca valley has a higher median income of $54,153 compared to $45,206 in Fort scott.
  • In Fort scott, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 34.0% in Yucca valley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fort scott at 14%, compared to 12% in Yucca valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Yucca valley is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Fort scott.

Demographics

Demographics Yucca valley vs Fort scott provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Yucca valley Fort scott
Black 4 4
White 51 87
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 25 3
Two or More Races 16 6
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Yucca valley vs Fort scott

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Yucca valley and Fort scott at 4%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort scott at 87% compared to 51% in Yucca valley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Yucca valley at 2% compared to 0% in Fort scott.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Yucca valley at 25% compared to 3% in Fort scott.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Yucca valley at 16% compared to 6% in Fort scott.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Yucca valley at 2% compared to 0% in Fort scott.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Yucca valley Fort scott
Mental Health Not Good 19.2% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 13.6% 12.3%
Depression 22.0% 23.2%
Smoking 16.7% 22.8%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 16.6%
Obesity 38.8% 42.7%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Yucca valley vs Fort scott

  • More residents in Yucca valley report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.3% in Fort scott.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fort scott at 23.2% versus 22.0% in Yucca valley.
  • Fort scott has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 16.7% in Yucca valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort scott at 16.6% compared to 16.4% in Yucca valley.
  • Fort scott has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 38.8% in Yucca valley.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort scott at 21.0% compared to 20.0% in Yucca valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Yucca valley Fort scott
No Schooling 0.9% (191) 0.4% (30)
High School Diploma 17.3% (3,754) 13.7% (1,041)
Less than High School 15.6% (3,383) 16.9% (1,285)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.4% (2,907) 13.5% (1,029)

Education Levels Comparison: Yucca valley vs Fort scott

  • A higher percentage of residents in Yucca valley have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Fort scott.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Yucca valley hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 13.7% in Fort scott.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort scott at 16.9%, compared to 15.6% in Yucca valley.
  • In Fort scott, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.5% compared to 13.4% in Yucca valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.