Demographics details for Yucca valley, CA vs Fort lupton, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Yucca valley, CA vs Fort lupton, CO.

Data Yucca valley Fort lupton
Population 21,662 8,829
Median Age 39.9 years 35.9 years
Median Income $54,153 $71,293
Married Families 34.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Yucca valley vs Fort lupton

  • In Yucca valley, the population is higher at 21,662, compared to 8,829 in Fort lupton.
  • Residents in Yucca valley have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 35.9 years in Fort lupton.
  • Fort lupton has a higher median income of $71,293, compared to $54,153 in Yucca valley.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Yucca valley and Fort lupton at 34.0%.
  • Yucca valley has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Fort lupton.
  • The unemployment rate in Yucca valley is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in Fort lupton.

Demographics

Demographics Yucca valley vs Fort lupton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Yucca valley Fort lupton
Black 4 Data is updating
White 51 26
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 25 53
Two or More Races 16 20
American Indian 2 1

Demographics Comparison: Yucca valley vs Fort lupton

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Yucca valley at 4% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
  • Yucca valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 51% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Yucca valley at 2% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
  • Fort lupton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 53%, compared to 25% in Yucca valley.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort lupton at 20%, compared to 16% in Yucca valley.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Yucca valley at 2% compared to 1% in Fort lupton.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Yucca valley Fort lupton
Mental Health Not Good 19.2% 15.8%
Physical Health Not Good 13.6% 11.8%
Depression 22.0% 19.9%
Smoking 16.7% 15.0%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 17.0%
Obesity 38.8% 30.2%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Yucca valley vs Fort lupton

  • More residents in Yucca valley report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.8% in Fort lupton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Yucca valley at 22.0% compared to 19.9% in Fort lupton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Yucca valley at 16.7% compared to 15.0% in Fort lupton.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort lupton at 17.0% compared to 16.4% in Yucca valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Yucca valley at 38.8% compared to 30.2% in Fort lupton.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Yucca valley at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort lupton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Yucca valley Fort lupton
No Schooling 0.9% (191) 1.6% (145)
High School Diploma 17.3% (3,754) 16.2% (1,428)
Less than High School 15.6% (3,383) 28.0% (2,476)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.4% (2,907) 7.0% (622)

Education Levels Comparison: Yucca valley vs Fort lupton

  • In Fort lupton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.9% in Yucca valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Yucca valley hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 16.2% in Fort lupton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort lupton at 28.0%, compared to 15.6% in Yucca valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Yucca valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.