Demographics details for Young harris, GA vs Toledo, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Young harris, GA vs Toledo, OH.
| Data | Young harris | Toledo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 810 | 266,301 |
| Median Age | 20.4 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $27,500 | $45,405 |
| Married Families | 19.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 26% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.7 |
Population Comparison: Young harris vs Toledo
- The population in Toledo is higher at 266,301, compared to 810 in Young harris.
- The median age in Toledo is higher at 35.4 years, compared to 20.4 years in Young harris.
- Toledo has a higher median income of $45,405, compared to $27,500 in Young harris.
- In Toledo, the percentage of married families is higher at 27.0%, compared to 19.0% in Young harris.
- The poverty level is higher in Toledo at 26%, compared to 0% in Young harris.
- Toledo has a higher unemployment rate at 6.7% compared to 3.5% in Young harris.
Demographics
Demographics Young harris vs Toledo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Young harris | Toledo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 14 | 28 |
| White | 70 | 54 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Young harris vs Toledo
- In Toledo, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 14% in Young harris.
- Young harris has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 54% in Toledo.
- In Toledo, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Young harris.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Young harris at 11% compared to 9% in Toledo.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Toledo at 8%, compared to 3% in Young harris.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Young harris at 2% compared to 0% in Toledo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Young harris | Toledo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 20.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 14.2% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 24.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 45.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Young harris vs Toledo
- In Toledo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 17.3% in Young harris.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Toledo at 24.8% versus 23.4% in Young harris.
- Toledo has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 17.3% in Young harris.
- Binge drinking is more common in Young harris at 16.9% compared to 14.8% in Toledo.
- Toledo has higher obesity rates at 45.1% compared to 33.5% in Young harris.
- Disability percentages are higher in Young harris at 23.0% compared to 18.0% in Toledo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Young harris | Toledo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (2) | 1.1% (2,922) |
| High School Diploma | 5.7% (46) | 18.4% (49,127) |
| Less than High School | 4.4% (36) | 13.0% (34,501) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (75) | 13.6% (36,267) |
Education Levels Comparison: Young harris vs Toledo
- In Toledo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.2% in Young harris.
- In Toledo, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 5.7% in Young harris.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Toledo at 13.0%, compared to 4.4% in Young harris.
- In Toledo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.6% compared to 9.3% in Young harris.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.