Demographics details for Young harris, GA vs Somerton, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Young harris, GA vs Somerton, AZ.

Data Young harris Somerton
Population 810 14,514
Median Age 20.4 years 30.4 years
Median Income $27,500 $64,180
Married Families 19.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Young harris vs Somerton

  • The population in Somerton is higher at 14,514, compared to 810 in Young harris.
  • The median age in Somerton is higher at 30.4 years, compared to 20.4 years in Young harris.
  • Somerton has a higher median income of $64,180, compared to $27,500 in Young harris.
  • In Somerton, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 19.0% in Young harris.
  • The poverty level is higher in Somerton at 15%, compared to 0% in Young harris.
  • Somerton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Young harris.

Demographics

Demographics Young harris vs Somerton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Young harris Somerton
Black 14 3
White 70 -37
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 11 95
Two or More Races 3 39
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Young harris vs Somerton

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Young harris at 14% compared to 3% in Somerton.
  • Young harris has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to -37% in Somerton.
  • Both Young harris and Somerton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Somerton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 95%, compared to 11% in Young harris.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Somerton at 39%, compared to 3% in Young harris.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Young harris at 2% compared to 0% in Somerton.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Young harris Somerton
Mental Health Not Good 17.3% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 16.0%
Depression 23.4% 18.3%
Smoking 17.3% 16.5%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 15.1%
Obesity 33.5% 44.4%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Young harris vs Somerton

  • In Somerton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 17.3% in Young harris.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Young harris at 23.4% compared to 18.3% in Somerton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Young harris at 17.3% compared to 16.5% in Somerton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Young harris at 16.9% compared to 15.1% in Somerton.
  • Somerton has higher obesity rates at 44.4% compared to 33.5% in Young harris.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Young harris at 23.0% compared to 7.0% in Somerton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Young harris Somerton
No Schooling 0.2% (2) 3.4% (498)
High School Diploma 5.7% (46) 11.2% (1,630)
Less than High School 4.4% (36) 37.3% (5,414)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.3% (75) 9.7% (1,411)

Education Levels Comparison: Young harris vs Somerton

  • In Somerton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 0.2% in Young harris.
  • In Somerton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.2% compared to 5.7% in Young harris.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Somerton at 37.3%, compared to 4.4% in Young harris.
  • In Somerton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.7% compared to 9.3% in Young harris.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.