Demographics details for Young harris, GA vs Scott city, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Young harris, GA vs Scott city, KS.

Data Young harris Scott city
Population 810 4,008
Median Age 20.4 years 36.0 years
Median Income $27,500 $47,217
Married Families 19.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.0

Population Comparison: Young harris vs Scott city

  • The population in Scott city is higher at 4,008, compared to 810 in Young harris.
  • The median age in Scott city is higher at 36.0 years, compared to 20.4 years in Young harris.
  • Scott city has a higher median income of $47,217, compared to $27,500 in Young harris.
  • In Scott city, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 19.0% in Young harris.
  • The poverty level is higher in Scott city at 10%, compared to 0% in Young harris.
  • Scott city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Young harris.

Demographics

Demographics Young harris vs Scott city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Young harris Scott city
Black 14 Data is updating
White 70 69
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 11 25
Two or More Races 3 5
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Young harris vs Scott city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Young harris at 14% compared to 0% in Scott city.
  • Young harris has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 69% in Scott city.
  • In Scott city, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Young harris.
  • Scott city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 11% in Young harris.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Scott city at 5%, compared to 3% in Young harris.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Young harris at 2% compared to 0% in Scott city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Young harris Scott city
Mental Health Not Good 17.3% 15.6%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 10.3%
Depression 23.4% 19.7%
Smoking 17.3% 17.6%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 19.2%
Obesity 33.5% 38.1%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Young harris vs Scott city

  • More residents in Young harris report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 15.6% in Scott city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Young harris at 23.4% compared to 19.7% in Scott city.
  • Scott city has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 17.3% in Young harris.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Scott city at 19.2% compared to 16.9% in Young harris.
  • Scott city has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 33.5% in Young harris.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Young harris at 23.0% compared to 11.0% in Scott city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Young harris Scott city
No Schooling 0.2% (2) 2.9% (116)
High School Diploma 5.7% (46) 13.5% (543)
Less than High School 4.4% (36) 24.2% (968)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.3% (75) 12.2% (490)

Education Levels Comparison: Young harris vs Scott city

  • In Scott city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.2% in Young harris.
  • In Scott city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.5% compared to 5.7% in Young harris.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Scott city at 24.2%, compared to 4.4% in Young harris.
  • In Scott city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 9.3% in Young harris.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.