Demographics details for Young harris, GA vs Laurel, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Young harris, GA vs Laurel, IN.
| Data | Young harris | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 810 | 411 |
| Median Age | 20.4 years | 27.8 years |
| Median Income | $27,500 | $23,125 |
| Married Families | 19.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Young harris vs Laurel
- In Young harris, the population is higher at 810, compared to 411 in Laurel.
- The median age in Laurel is higher at 27.8 years, compared to 20.4 years in Young harris.
- Young harris has a higher median income of $27,500 compared to $23,125 in Laurel.
- In Laurel, the percentage of married families is higher at 25.0%, compared to 19.0% in Young harris.
- The poverty level is higher in Laurel at 11%, compared to 0% in Young harris.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Young harris and Laurel at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Young harris vs Laurel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Young harris | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 14 | 5 |
| White | 70 | 74 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 21 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Young harris vs Laurel
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Young harris at 14% compared to 5% in Laurel.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Laurel at 74% compared to 70% in Young harris.
- Both Young harris and Laurel have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Young harris at 11% compared to 0% in Laurel.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Laurel at 21%, compared to 3% in Young harris.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Young harris at 2% compared to 0% in Laurel.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Young harris | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 27.9% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 26.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 37.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Young harris vs Laurel
- In Laurel, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 17.3% in Young harris.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Laurel at 27.9% versus 23.4% in Young harris.
- Laurel has a higher smoking rate at 26.2% compared to 17.3% in Young harris.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Laurel at 17.0% compared to 16.9% in Young harris.
- Laurel has higher obesity rates at 37.5% compared to 33.5% in Young harris.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Young harris and Laurel at 23.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Young harris | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (2) | 0.5% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 5.7% (46) | 30.7% (126) |
| Less than High School | 4.4% (36) | 47.9% (197) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (75) | 1.9% (8) |
Education Levels Comparison: Young harris vs Laurel
- In Laurel, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in Young harris.
- In Laurel, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.7% compared to 5.7% in Young harris.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Laurel at 47.9%, compared to 4.4% in Young harris.
- A higher percentage of residents in Young harris hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.3% compared to 1.9% in Laurel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.