Demographics details for Young harris, GA vs Gibsonburg, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Young harris, GA vs Gibsonburg, OH.

Data Young harris Gibsonburg
Population 810 2,436
Median Age 20.4 years 38.7 years
Median Income $27,500 $67,279
Married Families 19.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.3

Population Comparison: Young harris vs Gibsonburg

  • The population in Gibsonburg is higher at 2,436, compared to 810 in Young harris.
  • The median age in Gibsonburg is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 20.4 years in Young harris.
  • Gibsonburg has a higher median income of $67,279, compared to $27,500 in Young harris.
  • In Gibsonburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 19.0% in Young harris.
  • The poverty level is higher in Gibsonburg at 10%, compared to 0% in Young harris.
  • Gibsonburg has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.5% in Young harris.

Demographics

Demographics Young harris vs Gibsonburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Young harris Gibsonburg
Black 14 2
White 70 79
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 11 10
Two or More Races 3 9
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Young harris vs Gibsonburg

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Young harris at 14% compared to 2% in Gibsonburg.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Gibsonburg at 79% compared to 70% in Young harris.
  • Both Young harris and Gibsonburg have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Young harris at 11% compared to 10% in Gibsonburg.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gibsonburg at 9%, compared to 3% in Young harris.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Young harris at 2% compared to 0% in Gibsonburg.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Young harris Gibsonburg
Mental Health Not Good 17.3% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 12.3%
Depression 23.4% 23.0%
Smoking 17.3% 21.9%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 18.4%
Obesity 33.5% 42.4%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Young harris vs Gibsonburg

  • In Gibsonburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 17.3% in Young harris.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Young harris at 23.4% compared to 23.0% in Gibsonburg.
  • Gibsonburg has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 17.3% in Young harris.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Gibsonburg at 18.4% compared to 16.9% in Young harris.
  • Gibsonburg has higher obesity rates at 42.4% compared to 33.5% in Young harris.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Young harris at 23.0% compared to 11.0% in Gibsonburg.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Young harris Gibsonburg
No Schooling 0.2% (2) 0.2% (4)
High School Diploma 5.7% (46) 35.6% (867)
Less than High School 4.4% (36) 5.1% (125)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.3% (75) 11.3% (275)

Education Levels Comparison: Young harris vs Gibsonburg

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Young harris and Gibsonburg at 0.2%.
  • In Gibsonburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.6% compared to 5.7% in Young harris.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gibsonburg at 5.1%, compared to 4.4% in Young harris.
  • In Gibsonburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.3% compared to 9.3% in Young harris.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.