Demographics details for Young harris, GA vs Cedar park, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Young harris, GA vs Cedar park, TX.

Data Young harris Cedar park
Population 810 77,642
Median Age 20.4 years 37.6 years
Median Income $27,500 $118,903
Married Families 19.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.6

Population Comparison: Young harris vs Cedar park

  • The population in Cedar park is higher at 77,642, compared to 810 in Young harris.
  • The median age in Cedar park is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 20.4 years in Young harris.
  • Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903, compared to $27,500 in Young harris.
  • In Cedar park, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 19.0% in Young harris.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cedar park at 5%, compared to 0% in Young harris.
  • Cedar park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Young harris.

Demographics

Demographics Young harris vs Cedar park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Young harris Cedar park
Black 14 3
White 70 55
Asian Data is updating 12
Hispanic 11 20
Two or More Races 3 10
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Young harris vs Cedar park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Young harris at 14% compared to 3% in Cedar park.
  • Young harris has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 55% in Cedar park.
  • In Cedar park, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Young harris.
  • Cedar park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 11% in Young harris.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar park at 10%, compared to 3% in Young harris.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Young harris at 2% compared to 0% in Cedar park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Young harris Cedar park
Mental Health Not Good 17.3% 14.9%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 8.8%
Depression 23.4% 24.1%
Smoking 17.3% 11.0%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 17.9%
Obesity 33.5% 31.0%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Young harris vs Cedar park

  • More residents in Young harris report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar park at 24.1% versus 23.4% in Young harris.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Young harris at 17.3% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar park at 17.9% compared to 16.9% in Young harris.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Young harris at 33.5% compared to 31.0% in Cedar park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Young harris at 23.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Young harris Cedar park
No Schooling 0.2% (2) 0.4% (287)
High School Diploma 5.7% (46) 8.9% (6,896)
Less than High School 4.4% (36) 4.1% (3,156)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.3% (75) 35.8% (27,785)

Education Levels Comparison: Young harris vs Cedar park

  • In Cedar park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Young harris.
  • In Cedar park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 8.9% compared to 5.7% in Young harris.
  • More residents in Young harris have less than a high school education at 4.4% compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
  • In Cedar park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 9.3% in Young harris.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.