Demographics details for Young harris, GA vs Ash fork, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Young harris, GA vs Ash fork, AZ.
| Data | Young harris | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 810 | 466 |
| Median Age | 20.4 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $27,500 | $79,861 |
| Married Families | 19.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Young harris vs Ash fork
- In Young harris, the population is higher at 810, compared to 466 in Ash fork.
- The median age in Ash fork is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 20.4 years in Young harris.
- Ash fork has a higher median income of $79,861, compared to $27,500 in Young harris.
- In Ash fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 19.0% in Young harris.
- The poverty level is higher in Ash fork at 10%, compared to 0% in Young harris.
- Ash fork has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Young harris.
Demographics
Demographics Young harris vs Ash fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Young harris | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 14 | Data is updating |
| White | 70 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 15 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Young harris vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Young harris at 14% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ash fork at 79% compared to 70% in Young harris.
- Both Young harris and Ash fork have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Young harris at 11% compared to 6% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ash fork at 15%, compared to 3% in Young harris.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Young harris at 2% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Young harris | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 30.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Young harris vs Ash fork
- In Ash fork, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.3% in Young harris.
- Depression is more prevalent in Young harris at 23.4% compared to 21.4% in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 17.3% in Young harris.
- Binge drinking is more common in Young harris at 16.9% compared to 15.9% in Ash fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Young harris at 33.5% compared to 30.6% in Ash fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ash fork at 26.0% compared to 23.0% in Young harris.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Young harris | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (2) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 5.7% (46) | 13.1% (61) |
| Less than High School | 4.4% (36) | 23.6% (110) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (75) | 8.8% (41) |
Education Levels Comparison: Young harris vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Young harris have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Ash fork.
- In Ash fork, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.1% compared to 5.7% in Young harris.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ash fork at 23.6%, compared to 4.4% in Young harris.
- A higher percentage of residents in Young harris hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.3% compared to 8.8% in Ash fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.