Demographics details for York, SC vs Chandlerville, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in York, SC vs Chandlerville, IL.
| Data | York | Chandlerville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,648 | 514 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 44.8 years |
| Median Income | $50,177 | $42,031 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: York vs Chandlerville
- In York, the population is higher at 8,648, compared to 514 in Chandlerville.
- The median age in Chandlerville is higher at 44.8 years, compared to 37.0 years in York.
- York has a higher median income of $50,177 compared to $42,031 in Chandlerville.
- In Chandlerville, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 27.0% in York.
- The poverty level is higher in Chandlerville at 12%, compared to 11% in York.
- The unemployment rate in York is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Chandlerville.
Demographics
Demographics York vs Chandlerville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | York | Chandlerville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 31 | Data is updating |
| White | 46 | 96 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: York vs Chandlerville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in York at 31% compared to 0% in Chandlerville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chandlerville at 96% compared to 46% in York.
- Both York and Chandlerville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in York at 11% compared to 0% in Chandlerville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in York at 12% compared to 3% in Chandlerville.
- In Chandlerville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in York.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | York | Chandlerville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 18.9% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 39.0% | 35.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: York vs Chandlerville
- More residents in York report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.9% in Chandlerville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chandlerville at 22.9% versus 21.4% in York.
- Smoking is more prevalent in York at 18.9% compared to 18.3% in Chandlerville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chandlerville at 17.8% compared to 15.7% in York.
- Obesity rates are higher in York at 39.0% compared to 35.6% in Chandlerville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chandlerville at 21.0% compared to 13.0% in York.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | York | Chandlerville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.7% (406) | 1.0% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 20.5% (1,777) | 30.9% (159) |
| Less than High School | 15.5% (1,344) | 41.2% (212) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.2% (969) | 4.1% (21) |
Education Levels Comparison: York vs Chandlerville
- A higher percentage of residents in York have no formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 1.0% in Chandlerville.
- In Chandlerville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.9% compared to 20.5% in York.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chandlerville at 41.2%, compared to 15.5% in York.
- A higher percentage of residents in York hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.2% compared to 4.1% in Chandlerville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.