Demographics details for Yorba linda, CA vs Little falls, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Yorba linda, CA vs Little falls, MN.

Data Yorba linda Little falls
Population 67,089 9,094
Median Age 44.3 years 40.8 years
Median Income $148,325 $44,455
Married Families 52.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 5% 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 4.2

Population Comparison: Yorba linda vs Little falls

  • In Yorba linda, the population is higher at 67,089, compared to 9,094 in Little falls.
  • Residents in Yorba linda have a higher median age of 44.3 years compared to 40.8 years in Little falls.
  • Yorba linda has a higher median income of $148,325 compared to $44,455 in Little falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Yorba linda at 52.0% compared to 34.0% in Little falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Little falls at 11%, compared to 5% in Yorba linda.
  • Little falls has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.8% in Yorba linda.

Demographics

Demographics Yorba linda vs Little falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Yorba linda Little falls
Black 1 Data is updating
White 47 95
Asian 24 1
Hispanic 18 1
Two or More Races 10 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Yorba linda vs Little falls

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Yorba linda at 1% compared to 0% in Little falls.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Little falls at 95% compared to 47% in Yorba linda.
  • The Asian population is larger in Yorba linda at 24% compared to 1% in Little falls.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Yorba linda at 18% compared to 1% in Little falls.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Yorba linda at 10% compared to 3% in Little falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Yorba linda and Little falls at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Yorba linda Little falls
Mental Health Not Good 13.2% 16.6%
Physical Health Not Good 7.9% 10.9%
Depression 17.4% 25.0%
Smoking 7.9% 22.3%
Binge Drinking 17.8% 20.6%
Obesity 23.2% 38.5%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Yorba linda vs Little falls

  • In Little falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 13.2% in Yorba linda.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Little falls at 25.0% versus 17.4% in Yorba linda.
  • Little falls has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 7.9% in Yorba linda.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Little falls at 20.6% compared to 17.8% in Yorba linda.
  • Little falls has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 23.2% in Yorba linda.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Little falls at 17.0% compared to 8.0% in Yorba linda.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Yorba linda Little falls
No Schooling 0.4% (244) 0.7% (63)
High School Diploma 7.7% (5,151) 25.4% (2,308)
Less than High School 5.2% (3,507) 11.7% (1,063)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 39.5% (26,487) 14.3% (1,301)

Education Levels Comparison: Yorba linda vs Little falls

  • In Little falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Yorba linda.
  • In Little falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.4% compared to 7.7% in Yorba linda.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Little falls at 11.7%, compared to 5.2% in Yorba linda.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Yorba linda hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.5% compared to 14.3% in Little falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.