Demographics details for Yoder, WY vs Fancy farm, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yoder, WY vs Fancy farm, KY.
Data | Yoder | Fancy farm |
---|---|---|
Population | 131 | 300 |
Median Age | 56.2 years | 51.1 years |
Median Income | $27,417 | $55,060 |
Married Families | 51.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Yoder vs Fancy farm
- The population in Fancy farm is higher at 300, compared to 131 in Yoder.
- Residents in Yoder have a higher median age of 56.2 years compared to 51.1 years in Fancy farm.
- Fancy farm has a higher median income of $55,060, compared to $27,417 in Yoder.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Yoder at 51.0% compared to 31.0% in Fancy farm.
- Yoder has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Fancy farm.
- The unemployment rate in Yoder is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Fancy farm.
Demographics
Demographics Yoder vs Fancy farm provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Yoder | Fancy farm |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 3 |
White | 92 | 91 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Yoder vs Fancy farm
- In Fancy farm, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Yoder.
- Yoder has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 91% in Fancy farm.
- Both Yoder and Fancy farm have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Yoder and Fancy farm at 0%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Yoder at 8% compared to 6% in Fancy farm.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Yoder and Fancy farm at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Yoder | Fancy farm |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 12.6% |
Depression | 20.6% | 27.3% |
Smoking | 17.9% | 20.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 29.4% | 37.4% |
Disability Percentage | 37.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yoder vs Fancy farm
- In Fancy farm, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.2% in Yoder.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fancy farm at 27.3% versus 20.6% in Yoder.
- Fancy farm has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 17.9% in Yoder.
- Binge drinking is more common in Yoder at 17.7% compared to 16.7% in Fancy farm.
- Fancy farm has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 29.4% in Yoder.
- Disability percentages are higher in Yoder at 37.0% compared to 14.0% in Fancy farm.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Yoder | Fancy farm |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 12.2% (16) | 47.7% (143) |
Less than High School | 15.3% (20) | 5.3% (16) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.9% (9) | 14.3% (43) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yoder vs Fancy farm
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Yoder and Fancy farm at 0.0%.
- In Fancy farm, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 47.7% compared to 12.2% in Yoder.
- More residents in Yoder have less than a high school education at 15.3% compared to 5.3% in Fancy farm.
- In Fancy farm, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.3% compared to 6.9% in Yoder.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.