Demographics details for Yellville, AR vs New holland, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yellville, AR vs New holland, OH.
Data | Yellville | New holland |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,170 | 822 |
Median Age | 33.2 years | 40.4 years |
Median Income | $33,983 | $44,167 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Yellville vs New holland
- In Yellville, the population is higher at 1,170, compared to 822 in New holland.
- The median age in New holland is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 33.2 years in Yellville.
- New holland has a higher median income of $44,167, compared to $33,983 in Yellville.
- In New holland, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 34.0% in Yellville.
- Yellville has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 12% in New holland.
- New holland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.7% in Yellville.
Demographics
Demographics Yellville vs New holland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Yellville | New holland |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 2 |
White | 81 | 93 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Yellville vs New holland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Yellville at 6% compared to 2% in New holland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in New holland at 93% compared to 81% in Yellville.
- The Asian population is larger in Yellville at 1% compared to 0% in New holland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Yellville at 4% compared to 2% in New holland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Yellville at 8% compared to 3% in New holland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Yellville and New holland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Yellville | New holland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 22.5% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 12.0% |
Depression | 29.9% | 24.3% |
Smoking | 27.4% | 21.3% |
Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 18.8% |
Obesity | 39.9% | 41.8% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yellville vs New holland
- More residents in Yellville report poor mental health at 22.5% compared to 17.6% in New holland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Yellville at 29.9% compared to 24.3% in New holland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Yellville at 27.4% compared to 21.3% in New holland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in New holland at 18.8% compared to 14.6% in Yellville.
- New holland has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 39.9% in Yellville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in New holland at 24.0% compared to 21.0% in Yellville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Yellville | New holland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (6) | 1.0% (8) |
High School Diploma | 24.1% (282) | 25.2% (207) |
Less than High School | 16.3% (191) | 30.2% (248) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.2% (84) | 5.2% (43) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yellville vs New holland
- In New holland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Yellville.
- In New holland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.2% compared to 24.1% in Yellville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in New holland at 30.2%, compared to 16.3% in Yellville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Yellville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.2% compared to 5.2% in New holland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.