Demographics details for Yellville, AR vs Mercer, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yellville, AR vs Mercer, WI.
| Data | Yellville | Mercer |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,170 | 1,732 |
| Median Age | 33.2 years | 55.0 years |
| Median Income | $33,983 | $50,000 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Yellville vs Mercer
- The population in Mercer is higher at 1,732, compared to 1,170 in Yellville.
- The median age in Mercer is higher at 55.0 years, compared to 33.2 years in Yellville.
- Mercer has a higher median income of $50,000, compared to $33,983 in Yellville.
- In Mercer, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 34.0% in Yellville.
- Yellville has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Mercer.
- Mercer has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.7% in Yellville.
Demographics
Demographics Yellville vs Mercer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Yellville | Mercer |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | Data is updating |
| White | 81 | 97 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Yellville vs Mercer
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Yellville at 6% compared to 0% in Mercer.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mercer at 97% compared to 81% in Yellville.
- Both Yellville and Mercer have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Yellville at 4% compared to 1% in Mercer.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Yellville at 8% compared to 1% in Mercer.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Yellville and Mercer at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Yellville | Mercer |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.5% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 29.9% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 27.4% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yellville vs Mercer
- More residents in Yellville report poor mental health at 22.5% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
- Depression is more prevalent in Yellville at 29.9% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Yellville at 27.4% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
- Binge drinking is more common in Yellville at 14.6% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
- Obesity rates are higher in Yellville at 39.9% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
- Disability percentages are higher in Yellville at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Yellville | Mercer |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (6) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 24.1% (282) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 16.3% (191) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.2% (84) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yellville vs Mercer
- A higher percentage of residents in Yellville have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Yellville hold a high school diploma at 24.1% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
- More residents in Yellville have less than a high school education at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Yellville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.2% compared to 0.0% in Mercer.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.