Demographics details for Yellville, AR vs Klamath falls, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yellville, AR vs Klamath falls, OR.
Data | Yellville | Klamath falls |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,170 | 21,977 |
Median Age | 33.2 years | 35.1 years |
Median Income | $33,983 | $46,695 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Yellville vs Klamath falls
- The population in Klamath falls is higher at 21,977, compared to 1,170 in Yellville.
- The median age in Klamath falls is higher at 35.1 years, compared to 33.2 years in Yellville.
- Klamath falls has a higher median income of $46,695, compared to $33,983 in Yellville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Yellville at 34.0% compared to 31.0% in Klamath falls.
- The poverty level is identical in both Yellville and Klamath falls at 18%.
- Klamath falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.7% in Yellville.
Demographics
Demographics Yellville vs Klamath falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Yellville | Klamath falls |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 1 |
White | 81 | 69 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 4 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Yellville vs Klamath falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Yellville at 6% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
- Yellville has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 69% in Klamath falls.
- Both Yellville and Klamath falls have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Klamath falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 4% in Yellville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Klamath falls at 11%, compared to 8% in Yellville.
- In Klamath falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Yellville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Yellville | Klamath falls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 22.5% | 20.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 13.4% |
Depression | 29.9% | 28.4% |
Smoking | 27.4% | 19.9% |
Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 15.8% |
Obesity | 39.9% | 35.9% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yellville vs Klamath falls
- More residents in Yellville report poor mental health at 22.5% compared to 20.2% in Klamath falls.
- Depression is more prevalent in Yellville at 29.9% compared to 28.4% in Klamath falls.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Yellville at 27.4% compared to 19.9% in Klamath falls.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Klamath falls at 15.8% compared to 14.6% in Yellville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Yellville at 39.9% compared to 35.9% in Klamath falls.
- Disability percentages are higher in Yellville at 21.0% compared to 20.0% in Klamath falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Yellville | Klamath falls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (6) | 0.9% (192) |
High School Diploma | 24.1% (282) | 16.0% (3,508) |
Less than High School | 16.3% (191) | 15.5% (3,401) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.2% (84) | 14.4% (3,175) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yellville vs Klamath falls
- In Klamath falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Yellville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Yellville hold a high school diploma at 24.1% compared to 16.0% in Klamath falls.
- More residents in Yellville have less than a high school education at 16.3% compared to 15.5% in Klamath falls.
- In Klamath falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 7.2% in Yellville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.