Demographics details for Yellville, AR vs Farmersburg, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yellville, AR vs Farmersburg, IA.
Data | Yellville | Farmersburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,170 | 268 |
Median Age | 33.2 years | 35.7 years |
Median Income | $33,983 | $46,641 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 56.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Yellville vs Farmersburg
- In Yellville, the population is higher at 1,170, compared to 268 in Farmersburg.
- The median age in Farmersburg is higher at 35.7 years, compared to 33.2 years in Yellville.
- Farmersburg has a higher median income of $46,641, compared to $33,983 in Yellville.
- In Farmersburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 34.0% in Yellville.
- Yellville has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Farmersburg.
- The unemployment rate in Yellville is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.5% in Farmersburg.
Demographics
Demographics Yellville vs Farmersburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Yellville | Farmersburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | Data is updating |
White | 81 | 94 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Yellville vs Farmersburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Yellville at 6% compared to 0% in Farmersburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmersburg at 94% compared to 81% in Yellville.
- The Asian population is larger in Yellville at 1% compared to 0% in Farmersburg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Yellville at 4% compared to 2% in Farmersburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Yellville at 8% compared to 4% in Farmersburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Yellville and Farmersburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Yellville | Farmersburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 22.5% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 10.8% |
Depression | 29.9% | 19.3% |
Smoking | 27.4% | 20.2% |
Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 21.7% |
Obesity | 39.9% | 40.5% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yellville vs Farmersburg
- More residents in Yellville report poor mental health at 22.5% compared to 16.9% in Farmersburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Yellville at 29.9% compared to 19.3% in Farmersburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Yellville at 27.4% compared to 20.2% in Farmersburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Farmersburg at 21.7% compared to 14.6% in Yellville.
- Farmersburg has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 39.9% in Yellville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Yellville at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Farmersburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Yellville | Farmersburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (6) | 0.7% (2) |
High School Diploma | 24.1% (282) | 37.7% (101) |
Less than High School | 16.3% (191) | 20.9% (56) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.2% (84) | 5.2% (14) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yellville vs Farmersburg
- In Farmersburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Yellville.
- In Farmersburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 37.7% compared to 24.1% in Yellville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Farmersburg at 20.9%, compared to 16.3% in Yellville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Yellville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.2% compared to 5.2% in Farmersburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.