Demographics details for Yazoo city, MS vs Trumann, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yazoo city, MS vs Trumann, AR.
| Data | Yazoo city | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,844 | 7,305 |
| Median Age | 31.5 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $31,310 | $37,618 |
| Married Families | 18.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 25% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Yazoo city vs Trumann
- In Yazoo city, the population is higher at 9,844, compared to 7,305 in Trumann.
- The median age in Trumann is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 31.5 years in Yazoo city.
- Trumann has a higher median income of $37,618, compared to $31,310 in Yazoo city.
- In Trumann, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 18.0% in Yazoo city.
- Yazoo city has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 13% in Trumann.
- The unemployment rate in Yazoo city is higher at 6.0%, compared to 4.2% in Trumann.
Demographics
Demographics Yazoo city vs Trumann provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Yazoo city | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 96 | 5 |
| White | 3 | 84 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Yazoo city vs Trumann
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Yazoo city at 96% compared to 5% in Trumann.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Trumann at 84% compared to 3% in Yazoo city.
- Both Yazoo city and Trumann have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Trumann has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Yazoo city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Trumann at 8%, compared to 1% in Yazoo city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Yazoo city and Trumann at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Yazoo city | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.5% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 19.0% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 21.9% | 28.5% |
| Smoking | 31.1% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 9.7% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 52.1% | 44.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yazoo city vs Trumann
- More residents in Yazoo city report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 20.8% in Trumann.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Trumann at 28.5% versus 21.9% in Yazoo city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Yazoo city at 31.1% compared to 25.0% in Trumann.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Trumann at 14.4% compared to 9.7% in Yazoo city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Yazoo city at 52.1% compared to 44.6% in Trumann.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Trumann at 24.0% compared to 14.0% in Yazoo city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Yazoo city | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (155) | 1.8% (135) |
| High School Diploma | 24.5% (2,407) | 25.9% (1,895) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (1,671) | 24.4% (1,780) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.5% (642) | 6.7% (487) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yazoo city vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.6% in Yazoo city.
- In Trumann, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.9% compared to 24.5% in Yazoo city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Trumann at 24.4%, compared to 17.0% in Yazoo city.
- In Trumann, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.7% compared to 6.5% in Yazoo city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.