Demographics details for Yankton, SD vs Kendall park, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yankton, SD vs Kendall park, NJ.
| Data | Yankton | Kendall park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,534 | 10,624 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 44.5 years |
| Median Income | $60,180 | $159,362 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Yankton vs Kendall park
- In Yankton, the population is higher at 15,534, compared to 10,624 in Kendall park.
- The median age in Kendall park is higher at 44.5 years, compared to 39.9 years in Yankton.
- Kendall park has a higher median income of $159,362, compared to $60,180 in Yankton.
- In Kendall park, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 37.0% in Yankton.
- Yankton has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 2% in Kendall park.
- The unemployment rate in Yankton is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Kendall park.
Demographics
Demographics Yankton vs Kendall park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Yankton | Kendall park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 81 | 46 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 31 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Yankton vs Kendall park
- In Kendall park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Yankton.
- Yankton has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 46% in Kendall park.
- In Kendall park, the Asian population stands at 31%, greater than 0% in Yankton.
- Kendall park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 7% in Yankton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Yankton at 7% compared to 6% in Kendall park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Yankton at 3% compared to 0% in Kendall park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Yankton | Kendall park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 7.2% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 8.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.3% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 37.9% | 25.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yankton vs Kendall park
- More residents in Yankton report poor mental health at 13.9% compared to 12.5% in Kendall park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Yankton at 17.9% compared to 17.6% in Kendall park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Yankton at 18.3% compared to 8.6% in Kendall park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Yankton at 20.3% compared to 15.0% in Kendall park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Yankton at 37.9% compared to 25.1% in Kendall park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Yankton at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Kendall park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Yankton | Kendall park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (73) | 0.2% (25) |
| High School Diploma | 16.8% (2,614) | 11.8% (1,256) |
| Less than High School | 8.3% (1,290) | 9.3% (992) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.7% (3,222) | 38.1% (4,052) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yankton vs Kendall park
- A higher percentage of residents in Yankton have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in Kendall park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Yankton hold a high school diploma at 16.8% compared to 11.8% in Kendall park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kendall park at 9.3%, compared to 8.3% in Yankton.
- In Kendall park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 20.7% in Yankton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.