Demographics details for Yamhill, OR vs Lancaster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yamhill, OR vs Lancaster, CA.
| Data | Yamhill | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 108,226 | 169,185 |
| Median Age | 39.4 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $80,125 | $71,367 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Yamhill vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 169,185, compared to 108,226 in Yamhill.
- Residents in Yamhill have a higher median age of 39.4 years compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Yamhill has a higher median income of $80,125 compared to $71,367 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Yamhill at 41.0% compared to 32.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 15%, compared to 8% in Yamhill.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 3.6% in Yamhill.
Demographics
Demographics Yamhill vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Yamhill | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 21 |
| White | 71 | 10 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Yamhill vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 1% in Yamhill.
- Yamhill has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Yamhill.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 16% in Yamhill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 18%, compared to 10% in Yamhill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Yamhill and Lancaster at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Yamhill | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 26.2% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 14.3% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yamhill vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.3% in Yamhill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Yamhill at 26.2% compared to 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 14.3% in Yamhill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Yamhill at 18.2% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Yamhill at 34.2% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Yamhill at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Yamhill | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (1,199) | 2.0% (3,403) |
| High School Diploma | 12.9% (13,953) | 17.5% (29,555) |
| Less than High School | 13.2% (14,338) | 21.5% (36,421) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.8% (21,461) | 12.3% (20,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yamhill vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.1% in Yamhill.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.5% compared to 12.9% in Yamhill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 21.5%, compared to 13.2% in Yamhill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Yamhill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 12.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.