Demographics details for Yakima, WA vs Trumann, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yakima, WA vs Trumann, AR.
Data | Yakima | Trumann |
---|---|---|
Population | 97,012 | 7,305 |
Median Age | 33.9 years | 40.0 years |
Median Income | $55,734 | $37,618 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Yakima vs Trumann
- In Yakima, the population is higher at 97,012, compared to 7,305 in Trumann.
- The median age in Trumann is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 33.9 years in Yakima.
- Yakima has a higher median income of $55,734 compared to $37,618 in Trumann.
- In Trumann, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 33.0% in Yakima.
- Yakima has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 13% in Trumann.
- The unemployment rate in Yakima is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.2% in Trumann.
Demographics
Demographics Yakima vs Trumann provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Yakima | Trumann |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 5 |
White | 34 | 84 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 47 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Yakima vs Trumann
- In Trumann, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Yakima.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Trumann at 84% compared to 34% in Yakima.
- The Asian population is larger in Yakima at 1% compared to 0% in Trumann.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Yakima at 47% compared to 3% in Trumann.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Yakima at 16% compared to 8% in Trumann.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Yakima at 1% compared to 0% in Trumann.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Yakima | Trumann |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 20.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 15.2% |
Depression | 23.6% | 28.5% |
Smoking | 17.4% | 25.0% |
Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 14.4% |
Obesity | 39.7% | 44.6% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yakima vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 18.5% in Yakima.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Trumann at 28.5% versus 23.6% in Yakima.
- Trumann has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 17.4% in Yakima.
- Binge drinking is more common in Yakima at 15.4% compared to 14.4% in Trumann.
- Trumann has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 39.7% in Yakima.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Trumann at 24.0% compared to 16.0% in Yakima.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Yakima | Trumann |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (1,748) | 1.8% (135) |
High School Diploma | 13.4% (12,983) | 25.9% (1,895) |
Less than High School | 27.9% (27,106) | 24.4% (1,780) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (11,743) | 6.7% (487) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yakima vs Trumann
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Yakima and Trumann at 1.8%.
- In Trumann, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.9% compared to 13.4% in Yakima.
- More residents in Yakima have less than a high school education at 27.9% compared to 24.4% in Trumann.
- A higher percentage of residents in Yakima hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 6.7% in Trumann.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.