Demographics details for Yakima, WA vs Sulphur springs, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yakima, WA vs Sulphur springs, TX.
| Data | Yakima | Sulphur springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 97,012 | 16,408 |
| Median Age | 33.9 years | 39.4 years |
| Median Income | $55,734 | $54,950 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Yakima vs Sulphur springs
- In Yakima, the population is higher at 97,012, compared to 16,408 in Sulphur springs.
- The median age in Sulphur springs is higher at 39.4 years, compared to 33.9 years in Yakima.
- Yakima has a higher median income of $55,734 compared to $54,950 in Sulphur springs.
- In Sulphur springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 33.0% in Yakima.
- Yakima has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 15% in Sulphur springs.
- The unemployment rate in Yakima is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.5% in Sulphur springs.
Demographics
Demographics Yakima vs Sulphur springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Yakima | Sulphur springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 14 |
| White | 34 | 63 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 47 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Yakima vs Sulphur springs
- In Sulphur springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 1% in Yakima.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sulphur springs at 63% compared to 34% in Yakima.
- Both Yakima and Sulphur springs have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Yakima at 47% compared to 17% in Sulphur springs.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Yakima at 16% compared to 5% in Sulphur springs.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Yakima at 1% compared to 0% in Sulphur springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Yakima | Sulphur springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yakima vs Sulphur springs
- In Sulphur springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.5% in Yakima.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sulphur springs at 24.8% versus 23.6% in Yakima.
- Sulphur springs has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 17.4% in Yakima.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sulphur springs at 17.5% compared to 15.4% in Yakima.
- Obesity rates are higher in Yakima at 39.7% compared to 39.5% in Sulphur springs.
- Disability percentages are higher in Yakima at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Sulphur springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Yakima | Sulphur springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (1,748) | 0.8% (127) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (12,983) | 18.3% (3,003) |
| Less than High School | 27.9% (27,106) | 16.0% (2,628) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (11,743) | 13.7% (2,248) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yakima vs Sulphur springs
- A higher percentage of residents in Yakima have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.8% in Sulphur springs.
- In Sulphur springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 13.4% in Yakima.
- More residents in Yakima have less than a high school education at 27.9% compared to 16.0% in Sulphur springs.
- In Sulphur springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 12.1% in Yakima.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.