Demographics details for Yakima, WA vs Fedscreek, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yakima, WA vs Fedscreek, KY.
Data | Yakima | Fedscreek |
---|---|---|
Population | 97,012 | 3,563 |
Median Age | 33.9 years | 38.2 years |
Median Income | $55,734 | $37,431 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Yakima vs Fedscreek
- In Yakima, the population is higher at 97,012, compared to 3,563 in Fedscreek.
- The median age in Fedscreek is higher at 38.2 years, compared to 33.9 years in Yakima.
- Yakima has a higher median income of $55,734 compared to $37,431 in Fedscreek.
- In Fedscreek, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 33.0% in Yakima.
- Yakima has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 15% in Fedscreek.
- The unemployment rate in Yakima is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.7% in Fedscreek.
Demographics
Demographics Yakima vs Fedscreek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Yakima | Fedscreek |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 34 | 94 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 47 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Yakima vs Fedscreek
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Yakima and Fedscreek at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fedscreek at 94% compared to 34% in Yakima.
- The Asian population is larger in Yakima at 1% compared to 0% in Fedscreek.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Yakima at 47% compared to 1% in Fedscreek.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Yakima at 16% compared to 4% in Fedscreek.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Yakima at 1% compared to 0% in Fedscreek.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Yakima | Fedscreek |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 23.6% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 17.4% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 15.4% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 39.7% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 33.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yakima vs Fedscreek
- More residents in Yakima report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
- Depression is more prevalent in Yakima at 23.6% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Yakima at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
- Binge drinking is more common in Yakima at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
- Obesity rates are higher in Yakima at 39.7% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fedscreek at 33.0% compared to 16.0% in Yakima.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Yakima | Fedscreek |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (1,748) | 3.6% (129) |
High School Diploma | 13.4% (12,983) | 22.2% (791) |
Less than High School | 27.9% (27,106) | 42.4% (1,510) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (11,743) | 6.9% (245) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yakima vs Fedscreek
- In Fedscreek, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 1.8% in Yakima.
- In Fedscreek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.2% compared to 13.4% in Yakima.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fedscreek at 42.4%, compared to 27.9% in Yakima.
- A higher percentage of residents in Yakima hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 6.9% in Fedscreek.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.