Demographics details for Yakima, WA vs Arnett, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yakima, WA vs Arnett, WV.
Data | Yakima | Arnett |
---|---|---|
Population | 97,012 | 59 |
Median Age | 33.9 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $55,734 | $35,000 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 24.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 35% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Yakima vs Arnett
- In Yakima, the population is higher at 97,012, compared to 59 in Arnett.
- The median age in Arnett is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 33.9 years in Yakima.
- Yakima has a higher median income of $55,734 compared to $35,000 in Arnett.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Yakima at 33.0% compared to 24.0% in Arnett.
- The poverty level is higher in Arnett at 35%, compared to 16% in Yakima.
- The unemployment rate in Yakima is higher at 5.4%, compared to 5.0% in Arnett.
Demographics
Demographics Yakima vs Arnett provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Yakima | Arnett |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 34 | 100 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 47 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 16 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Yakima vs Arnett
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Yakima at 1% compared to 0% in Arnett.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Arnett at 100% compared to 34% in Yakima.
- The Asian population is larger in Yakima at 1% compared to 0% in Arnett.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Yakima at 47% compared to 0% in Arnett.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Yakima at 16% compared to 0% in Arnett.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Yakima at 1% compared to 0% in Arnett.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Yakima | Arnett |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 23.6% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 17.4% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 15.4% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 39.7% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yakima vs Arnett
- More residents in Yakima report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
- Depression is more prevalent in Yakima at 23.6% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Yakima at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
- Binge drinking is more common in Yakima at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
- Obesity rates are higher in Yakima at 39.7% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
- Disability percentages are higher in Yakima at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Yakima | Arnett |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (1,748) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 13.4% (12,983) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 27.9% (27,106) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (11,743) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yakima vs Arnett
- A higher percentage of residents in Yakima have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Yakima hold a high school diploma at 13.4% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
- More residents in Yakima have less than a high school education at 27.9% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Yakima hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.