Demographics details for Yadkinville, NC vs Woodstock, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Yadkinville, NC vs Woodstock, GA.

Data Yadkinville Woodstock
Population 2,997 37,350
Median Age 38.8 years 36.4 years
Median Income $41,148 $100,913
Married Families 33.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 15% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.4

Population Comparison: Yadkinville vs Woodstock

  • The population in Woodstock is higher at 37,350, compared to 2,997 in Yadkinville.
  • Residents in Yadkinville have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 36.4 years in Woodstock.
  • Woodstock has a higher median income of $100,913, compared to $41,148 in Yadkinville.
  • In Woodstock, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 33.0% in Yadkinville.
  • Yadkinville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Woodstock.
  • The unemployment rate in Yadkinville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.4% in Woodstock.

Demographics

Demographics Yadkinville vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Yadkinville Woodstock
Black 8 11
White 60 69
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 25 9
Two or More Races 7 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Yadkinville vs Woodstock

  • In Woodstock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 8% in Yadkinville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodstock at 69% compared to 60% in Yadkinville.
  • In Woodstock, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Yadkinville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Yadkinville at 25% compared to 9% in Woodstock.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 8%, compared to 7% in Yadkinville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Yadkinville and Woodstock at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Yadkinville Woodstock
Mental Health Not Good 16.5% 14.1%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 9.4%
Depression 23.9% 20.8%
Smoking 17.9% 12.1%
Binge Drinking 17.2% 16.5%
Obesity 36.8% 30.2%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Yadkinville vs Woodstock

  • More residents in Yadkinville report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 14.1% in Woodstock.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Yadkinville at 23.9% compared to 20.8% in Woodstock.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Yadkinville at 17.9% compared to 12.1% in Woodstock.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Yadkinville at 17.2% compared to 16.5% in Woodstock.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Yadkinville at 36.8% compared to 30.2% in Woodstock.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Yadkinville at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodstock.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Yadkinville Woodstock
No Schooling 1.5% (44) 0.3% (107)
High School Diploma 23.9% (715) 8.2% (3,052)
Less than High School 17.5% (523) 3.7% (1,375)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.1% (242) 32.9% (12,290)

Education Levels Comparison: Yadkinville vs Woodstock

  • A higher percentage of residents in Yadkinville have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.3% in Woodstock.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Yadkinville hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 8.2% in Woodstock.
  • More residents in Yadkinville have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 3.7% in Woodstock.
  • In Woodstock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.9% compared to 8.1% in Yadkinville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.