Demographics details for Yadkinville, NC vs Mcdonough, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Yadkinville, NC vs Mcdonough, GA.

Data Yadkinville Mcdonough
Population 2,997 30,340
Median Age 38.8 years 31.0 years
Median Income $41,148 $77,804
Married Families 33.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 15% 13%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.9

Population Comparison: Yadkinville vs Mcdonough

  • The population in Mcdonough is higher at 30,340, compared to 2,997 in Yadkinville.
  • Residents in Yadkinville have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 31.0 years in Mcdonough.
  • Mcdonough has a higher median income of $77,804, compared to $41,148 in Yadkinville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Yadkinville at 33.0% compared to 31.0% in Mcdonough.
  • Yadkinville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Mcdonough.
  • Mcdonough has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 4.5% in Yadkinville.

Demographics

Demographics Yadkinville vs Mcdonough provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Yadkinville Mcdonough
Black 8 70
White 60 14
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 25 6
Two or More Races 7 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Yadkinville vs Mcdonough

  • In Mcdonough, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 8% in Yadkinville.
  • Yadkinville has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 14% in Mcdonough.
  • In Mcdonough, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Yadkinville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Yadkinville at 25% compared to 6% in Mcdonough.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mcdonough at 8%, compared to 7% in Yadkinville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Yadkinville and Mcdonough at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Yadkinville Mcdonough
Mental Health Not Good 16.5% 16.4%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 11.6%
Depression 23.9% 19.6%
Smoking 17.9% 16.1%
Binge Drinking 17.2% 15.1%
Obesity 36.8% 39.5%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Yadkinville vs Mcdonough

  • More residents in Yadkinville report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.4% in Mcdonough.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Yadkinville at 23.9% compared to 19.6% in Mcdonough.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Yadkinville at 17.9% compared to 16.1% in Mcdonough.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Yadkinville at 17.2% compared to 15.1% in Mcdonough.
  • Mcdonough has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 36.8% in Yadkinville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Yadkinville at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Mcdonough.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Yadkinville Mcdonough
No Schooling 1.5% (44) 0.7% (221)
High School Diploma 23.9% (715) 14.8% (4,501)
Less than High School 17.5% (523) 4.9% (1,500)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.1% (242) 16.1% (4,882)

Education Levels Comparison: Yadkinville vs Mcdonough

  • A higher percentage of residents in Yadkinville have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.7% in Mcdonough.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Yadkinville hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 14.8% in Mcdonough.
  • More residents in Yadkinville have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 4.9% in Mcdonough.
  • In Mcdonough, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 8.1% in Yadkinville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.