Demographics details for Yadkinville, NC vs Laurel, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yadkinville, NC vs Laurel, MT.
Data | Yadkinville | Laurel |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,997 | 7,203 |
Median Age | 38.8 years | 36.5 years |
Median Income | $41,148 | $62,250 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Yadkinville vs Laurel
- The population in Laurel is higher at 7,203, compared to 2,997 in Yadkinville.
- Residents in Yadkinville have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 36.5 years in Laurel.
- Laurel has a higher median income of $62,250, compared to $41,148 in Yadkinville.
- In Laurel, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 33.0% in Yadkinville.
- Yadkinville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 7% in Laurel.
- The unemployment rate in Yadkinville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Laurel.
Demographics
Demographics Yadkinville vs Laurel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Yadkinville | Laurel |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | Data is updating |
White | 60 | 83 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 25 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Yadkinville vs Laurel
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Yadkinville at 8% compared to 0% in Laurel.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Laurel at 83% compared to 60% in Yadkinville.
- In Laurel, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Yadkinville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Yadkinville at 25% compared to 7% in Laurel.
- Both Yadkinville and Laurel have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
- In Laurel, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Yadkinville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Yadkinville | Laurel |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 16.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 10.8% |
Depression | 23.9% | 27.8% |
Smoking | 17.9% | 15.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 23.8% |
Obesity | 36.8% | 32.2% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yadkinville vs Laurel
- More residents in Yadkinville report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.4% in Laurel.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Laurel at 27.8% versus 23.9% in Yadkinville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Yadkinville at 17.9% compared to 15.8% in Laurel.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Laurel at 23.8% compared to 17.2% in Yadkinville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Yadkinville at 36.8% compared to 32.2% in Laurel.
- Disability percentages are higher in Yadkinville at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Laurel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Yadkinville | Laurel |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (44) | 0.2% (14) |
High School Diploma | 23.9% (715) | 21.7% (1,563) |
Less than High School | 17.5% (523) | 7.7% (556) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (242) | 10.8% (780) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yadkinville vs Laurel
- A higher percentage of residents in Yadkinville have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.2% in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of residents in Yadkinville hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 21.7% in Laurel.
- More residents in Yadkinville have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 7.7% in Laurel.
- In Laurel, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.8% compared to 8.1% in Yadkinville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.