Demographics details for Yacolt, WA vs Parker, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yacolt, WA vs Parker, SD.
Data | Yacolt | Parker |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,632 | 1,221 |
Median Age | 29.2 years | 39.3 years |
Median Income | $79,479 | $83,864 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Yacolt vs Parker
- In Yacolt, the population is higher at 1,632, compared to 1,221 in Parker.
- The median age in Parker is higher at 39.3 years, compared to 29.2 years in Yacolt.
- Parker has a higher median income of $83,864, compared to $79,479 in Yacolt.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Yacolt at 47.0% compared to 39.0% in Parker.
- Yacolt has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Parker.
- The unemployment rate in Yacolt is higher at 5.2%, compared to 2.0% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Yacolt vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Yacolt | Parker |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 4 |
White | 97 | 85 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Yacolt vs Parker
- In Parker, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Yacolt.
- Yacolt has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 85% in Parker.
- Both Yacolt and Parker have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Parker has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 1% in Yacolt.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Parker at 4%, compared to 1% in Yacolt.
- In Parker, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Yacolt.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Yacolt | Parker |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 13.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 9.0% |
Depression | 26.9% | 17.8% |
Smoking | 15.5% | 16.4% |
Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 20.4% |
Obesity | 33.0% | 34.4% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yacolt vs Parker
- More residents in Yacolt report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 13.5% in Parker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Yacolt at 26.9% compared to 17.8% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 15.5% in Yacolt.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Parker at 20.4% compared to 19.2% in Yacolt.
- Parker has higher obesity rates at 34.4% compared to 33.0% in Yacolt.
- Disability percentages are higher in Yacolt at 8.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Yacolt | Parker |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (12) | 0.2% (3) |
High School Diploma | 21.4% (349) | 17.9% (218) |
Less than High School | 13.1% (213) | 13.0% (159) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.9% (80) | 12.9% (158) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yacolt vs Parker
- A higher percentage of residents in Yacolt have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Yacolt hold a high school diploma at 21.4% compared to 17.9% in Parker.
- More residents in Yacolt have less than a high school education at 13.1% compared to 13.0% in Parker.
- In Parker, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.9% compared to 4.9% in Yacolt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.