Demographics details for Yacolt, WA vs Fairfield, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yacolt, WA vs Fairfield, CA.
| Data | Yacolt | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,632 | 119,338 |
| Median Age | 29.2 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $79,479 | $98,857 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Yacolt vs Fairfield
- The population in Fairfield is higher at 119,338, compared to 1,632 in Yacolt.
- The median age in Fairfield is higher at 35.8 years, compared to 29.2 years in Yacolt.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857, compared to $79,479 in Yacolt.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Yacolt at 47.0% compared to 39.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairfield at 12%, compared to 6% in Yacolt.
- The unemployment rate in Yacolt is higher at 5.2%, compared to 5.1% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Yacolt vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Yacolt | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 15 |
| White | 97 | 23 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 18 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Yacolt vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 1% in Yacolt.
- Yacolt has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 0% in Yacolt.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 1% in Yacolt.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairfield at 14%, compared to 1% in Yacolt.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Yacolt and Fairfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Yacolt | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 26.9% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 11.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 33.0% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yacolt vs Fairfield
- More residents in Yacolt report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.8% in Fairfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Yacolt at 26.9% compared to 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Yacolt at 15.5% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Yacolt at 19.2% compared to 16.1% in Fairfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Yacolt at 33.0% compared to 30.1% in Fairfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairfield at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Yacolt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Yacolt | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (12) | 2.1% (2,515) |
| High School Diploma | 21.4% (349) | 13.7% (16,358) |
| Less than High School | 13.1% (213) | 14.6% (17,464) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.9% (80) | 18.3% (21,856) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yacolt vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.7% in Yacolt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Yacolt hold a high school diploma at 21.4% compared to 13.7% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fairfield at 14.6%, compared to 13.1% in Yacolt.
- In Fairfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 4.9% in Yacolt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.