Demographics details for Xenia, OH vs American fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Xenia, OH vs American fork, UT.
| Data | Xenia | American fork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,612 | 37,268 |
| Median Age | 38.7 years | 28.0 years |
| Median Income | $53,041 | $90,490 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Xenia vs American fork
- The population in American fork is higher at 37,268, compared to 25,612 in Xenia.
- Residents in Xenia have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 28.0 years in American fork.
- American fork has a higher median income of $90,490, compared to $53,041 in Xenia.
- In American fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 35.0% in Xenia.
- Xenia has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 5% in American fork.
- The unemployment rate in Xenia is higher at 5.8%, compared to 4.2% in American fork.
Demographics
Demographics Xenia vs American fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Xenia | American fork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | Data is updating |
| White | 80 | 84 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Xenia vs American fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Xenia at 10% compared to 0% in American fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in American fork at 84% compared to 80% in Xenia.
- Both Xenia and American fork have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- American fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 3% in Xenia.
- Both Xenia and American fork have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Xenia and American fork at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Xenia | American fork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 21.7% | 6.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 8.5% |
| Obesity | 41.0% | 29.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Xenia vs American fork
- More residents in Xenia report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 14.2% in American fork.
- Depression is more prevalent in Xenia at 23.5% compared to 23.4% in American fork.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Xenia at 21.7% compared to 6.7% in American fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Xenia at 16.3% compared to 8.5% in American fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Xenia at 41.0% compared to 29.5% in American fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Xenia at 19.0% compared to 8.0% in American fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Xenia | American fork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (79) | 0.6% (208) |
| High School Diploma | 20.4% (5,228) | 7.4% (2,742) |
| Less than High School | 14.0% (3,588) | 5.7% (2,134) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (3,808) | 21.3% (7,922) |
Education Levels Comparison: Xenia vs American fork
- In American fork, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Xenia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Xenia hold a high school diploma at 20.4% compared to 7.4% in American fork.
- More residents in Xenia have less than a high school education at 14.0% compared to 5.7% in American fork.
- In American fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 14.9% in Xenia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.