Demographics details for Wyoming, MN vs Hazel park, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wyoming, MN vs Hazel park, MI.
Data | Wyoming | Hazel park |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,057 | 14,838 |
Median Age | 40.4 years | 37.2 years |
Median Income | $99,821 | $59,576 |
Married Families | 52.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 3% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Wyoming vs Hazel park
- The population in Hazel park is higher at 14,838, compared to 8,057 in Wyoming.
- Residents in Wyoming have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 37.2 years in Hazel park.
- Wyoming has a higher median income of $99,821 compared to $59,576 in Hazel park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wyoming at 52.0% compared to 30.0% in Hazel park.
- The poverty level is higher in Hazel park at 15%, compared to 3% in Wyoming.
- Hazel park has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Wyoming.
Demographics
Demographics Wyoming vs Hazel park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Wyoming | Hazel park |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 10 |
White | 98 | 72 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 1 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wyoming vs Hazel park
- In Hazel park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Wyoming.
- Wyoming has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 72% in Hazel park.
- In Hazel park, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Wyoming.
- Hazel park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 1% in Wyoming.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hazel park at 10%, compared to 1% in Wyoming.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wyoming and Hazel park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Wyoming | Hazel park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 12.9% |
Depression | 23.2% | 24.2% |
Smoking | 16.7% | 22.0% |
Binge Drinking | 21.3% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 35.5% | 35.9% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wyoming vs Hazel park
- In Hazel park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 14.9% in Wyoming.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hazel park at 24.2% versus 23.2% in Wyoming.
- Hazel park has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 16.7% in Wyoming.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wyoming at 21.3% compared to 17.1% in Hazel park.
- Hazel park has higher obesity rates at 35.9% compared to 35.5% in Wyoming.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hazel park at 22.0% compared to 10.0% in Wyoming.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Wyoming | Hazel park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (4) | 1.0% (152) |
High School Diploma | 13.8% (1,110) | 21.1% (3,127) |
Less than High School | 3.9% (318) | 16.1% (2,395) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.9% (1,685) | 16.9% (2,511) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wyoming vs Hazel park
- In Hazel park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Wyoming.
- In Hazel park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 13.8% in Wyoming.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hazel park at 16.1%, compared to 3.9% in Wyoming.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wyoming hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.9% compared to 16.9% in Hazel park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.