Demographics details for Wyoming, MI vs Union springs, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wyoming, MI vs Union springs, AL.
| Data | Wyoming | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 76,726 | 3,242 |
| Median Age | 33.9 years | 28.1 years |
| Median Income | $67,234 | $24,921 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Wyoming vs Union springs
- In Wyoming, the population is higher at 76,726, compared to 3,242 in Union springs.
- Residents in Wyoming have a higher median age of 33.9 years compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
- Wyoming has a higher median income of $67,234 compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wyoming at 37.0% compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
- The poverty level is higher in Union springs at 25%, compared to 11% in Wyoming.
- Union springs has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.4% in Wyoming.
Demographics
Demographics Wyoming vs Union springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wyoming | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 69 |
| White | 49 | 4 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 24 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wyoming vs Union springs
- In Union springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 69% compared to 10% in Wyoming.
- Wyoming has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- The Asian population is larger in Wyoming at 3% compared to 1% in Union springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Wyoming at 24% compared to 22% in Union springs.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wyoming at 13% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wyoming at 1% compared to 0% in Union springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wyoming | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 16.9% |
| Depression | 26.2% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 25.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 11.1% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 49.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wyoming vs Union springs
- In Union springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 17.8% in Wyoming.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wyoming at 26.2% compared to 20.8% in Union springs.
- Union springs has a higher smoking rate at 25.5% compared to 18.0% in Wyoming.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wyoming at 17.6% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
- Union springs has higher obesity rates at 49.5% compared to 33.5% in Wyoming.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union springs at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Wyoming.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wyoming | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (918) | 3.6% (117) |
| High School Diploma | 16.7% (12,843) | 15.1% (489) |
| Less than High School | 15.0% (11,484) | 33.7% (1,092) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (11,845) | 7.3% (237) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wyoming vs Union springs
- In Union springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 1.2% in Wyoming.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wyoming hold a high school diploma at 16.7% compared to 15.1% in Union springs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Union springs at 33.7%, compared to 15.0% in Wyoming.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wyoming hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.4% compared to 7.3% in Union springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.