Demographics details for Wyoming, MI vs Navajo dam, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wyoming, MI vs Navajo dam, NM.
Data | Wyoming | Navajo dam |
---|---|---|
Population | 76,726 | 330 |
Median Age | 33.9 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $67,234 | $63,375 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Wyoming vs Navajo dam
- In Wyoming, the population is higher at 76,726, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
- The median age in Navajo dam is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 33.9 years in Wyoming.
- Wyoming has a higher median income of $67,234 compared to $63,375 in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wyoming at 37.0% compared to 34.0% in Navajo dam.
- The poverty level is higher in Navajo dam at 14%, compared to 11% in Wyoming.
- The unemployment rate in Wyoming is higher at 4.4%, compared to 3.5% in Navajo dam.
Demographics
Demographics Wyoming vs Navajo dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Wyoming | Navajo dam |
---|---|---|
Black | 10 | Data is updating |
White | 49 | 16 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 24 | 67 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | 6 |
Demographics Comparison: Wyoming vs Navajo dam
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wyoming at 10% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- Wyoming has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to 16% in Navajo dam.
- The Asian population is larger in Wyoming at 3% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 67%, compared to 24% in Wyoming.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wyoming at 13% compared to 11% in Navajo dam.
- In Navajo dam, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 1% in Wyoming.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Wyoming | Navajo dam |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 15.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 11.2% |
Depression | 26.2% | 17.8% |
Smoking | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 14.1% |
Obesity | 33.5% | 32.6% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wyoming vs Navajo dam
- More residents in Wyoming report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.2% in Navajo dam.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wyoming at 26.2% compared to 17.8% in Navajo dam.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wyoming at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Navajo dam.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wyoming at 17.6% compared to 14.1% in Navajo dam.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wyoming at 33.5% compared to 32.6% in Navajo dam.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Navajo dam at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Wyoming.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Wyoming | Navajo dam |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (918) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 16.7% (12,843) | 4.8% (16) |
Less than High School | 15.0% (11,484) | 6.1% (20) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (11,845) | 22.7% (75) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wyoming vs Navajo dam
- A higher percentage of residents in Wyoming have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wyoming hold a high school diploma at 16.7% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
- More residents in Wyoming have less than a high school education at 15.0% compared to 6.1% in Navajo dam.
- In Navajo dam, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 15.4% in Wyoming.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.