Demographics details for Wyandotte, MI vs Hoover, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wyandotte, MI vs Hoover, AL.
| Data | Wyandotte | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,503 | 92,435 |
| Median Age | 39.6 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $62,111 | $101,765 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Wyandotte vs Hoover
- The population in Hoover is higher at 92,435, compared to 24,503 in Wyandotte.
- Residents in Wyandotte have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 38.3 years in Hoover.
- Hoover has a higher median income of $101,765, compared to $62,111 in Wyandotte.
- In Hoover, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 35.0% in Wyandotte.
- Wyandotte has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in Hoover.
- The unemployment rate in Wyandotte is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.2% in Hoover.
Demographics
Demographics Wyandotte vs Hoover provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wyandotte | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 20 |
| White | 85 | 67 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wyandotte vs Hoover
- In Hoover, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 2% in Wyandotte.
- Wyandotte has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 67% in Hoover.
- In Hoover, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Wyandotte.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Wyandotte at 7% compared to 5% in Hoover.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wyandotte at 5% compared to 3% in Hoover.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wyandotte and Hoover at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wyandotte | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 32.1% | 32.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wyandotte vs Hoover
- More residents in Wyandotte report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.9% in Hoover.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wyandotte at 25.3% compared to 21.3% in Hoover.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wyandotte at 20.8% compared to 11.0% in Hoover.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wyandotte at 19.5% compared to 16.7% in Hoover.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 32.1%.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wyandotte at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Hoover.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wyandotte | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (280) | 0.6% (583) |
| High School Diploma | 21.6% (5,291) | 7.3% (6,787) |
| Less than High School | 12.0% (2,952) | 3.8% (3,478) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (3,980) | 41.1% (38,000) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wyandotte vs Hoover
- A higher percentage of residents in Wyandotte have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Hoover.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wyandotte hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 7.3% in Hoover.
- More residents in Wyandotte have less than a high school education at 12.0% compared to 3.8% in Hoover.
- In Hoover, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.1% compared to 16.2% in Wyandotte.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.