Demographics details for Wurtsboro, NY vs Picayune, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wurtsboro, NY vs Picayune, MS.
| Data | Wurtsboro | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,083 | 11,826 |
| Median Age | 41.3 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $74,048 | $35,649 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Wurtsboro vs Picayune
- The population in Picayune is higher at 11,826, compared to 1,083 in Wurtsboro.
- Residents in Wurtsboro have a higher median age of 41.3 years compared to 38.3 years in Picayune.
- Wurtsboro has a higher median income of $74,048 compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wurtsboro at 42.0% compared to 27.0% in Picayune.
- The poverty level is higher in Picayune at 21%, compared to 8% in Wurtsboro.
- Picayune has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Wurtsboro.
Demographics
Demographics Wurtsboro vs Picayune provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wurtsboro | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 38 |
| White | 74 | 55 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wurtsboro vs Picayune
- In Picayune, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 1% in Wurtsboro.
- Wurtsboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 55% in Picayune.
- The Asian population is larger in Wurtsboro at 1% compared to 0% in Picayune.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Wurtsboro at 9% compared to 2% in Picayune.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wurtsboro at 15% compared to 5% in Picayune.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wurtsboro and Picayune at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wurtsboro | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wurtsboro vs Picayune
- In Picayune, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 16.3% in Wurtsboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Picayune at 24.0% versus 22.1% in Wurtsboro.
- Picayune has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 17.2% in Wurtsboro.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wurtsboro at 18.3% compared to 13.3% in Picayune.
- Picayune has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 34.9% in Wurtsboro.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Picayune at 21.0% compared to 13.0% in Wurtsboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wurtsboro | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 23.1% (250) | 17.8% (2,108) |
| Less than High School | 8.8% (95) | 11.8% (1,392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.3% (317) | 10.1% (1,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wurtsboro vs Picayune
- In Picayune, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Wurtsboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wurtsboro hold a high school diploma at 23.1% compared to 17.8% in Picayune.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Picayune at 11.8%, compared to 8.8% in Wurtsboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wurtsboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.3% compared to 10.1% in Picayune.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.