Demographics details for Wright, WY vs Scottsbluff, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wright, WY vs Scottsbluff, NE.
Data | Wright | Scottsbluff |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,640 | 14,283 |
Median Age | 35.8 years | 35.6 years |
Median Income | $88,150 | $55,744 |
Married Families | 55.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 2.6 |
Population Comparison: Wright vs Scottsbluff
- The population in Scottsbluff is higher at 14,283, compared to 1,640 in Wright.
- Residents in Wright have a higher median age of 35.8 years compared to 35.6 years in Scottsbluff.
- Wright has a higher median income of $88,150 compared to $55,744 in Scottsbluff.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wright at 55.0% compared to 36.0% in Scottsbluff.
- The poverty level is higher in Scottsbluff at 11%, compared to 5% in Wright.
- Scottsbluff has a higher unemployment rate at 2.6% compared to 2.5% in Wright.
Demographics
Demographics Wright vs Scottsbluff provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Wright | Scottsbluff |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 74 | 52 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 11 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Wright vs Scottsbluff
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Wright and Scottsbluff at 1%.
- Wright has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 52% in Scottsbluff.
- Both Wright and Scottsbluff have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Scottsbluff has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 11% in Wright.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wright at 13% compared to 12% in Scottsbluff.
- In Scottsbluff, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Wright.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Wright | Scottsbluff |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 15.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 11.9% |
Depression | 18.3% | 18.0% |
Smoking | 16.8% | 19.5% |
Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 34.3% | 42.3% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wright vs Scottsbluff
- In Scottsbluff, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 14.3% in Wright.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wright at 18.3% compared to 18.0% in Scottsbluff.
- Scottsbluff has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 16.8% in Wright.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wright at 19.0% compared to 17.6% in Scottsbluff.
- Scottsbluff has higher obesity rates at 42.3% compared to 34.3% in Wright.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Scottsbluff at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Wright.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Wright | Scottsbluff |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 9.8% (160) | 1.1% (156) |
High School Diploma | 20.5% (336) | 14.4% (2,056) |
Less than High School | 20.7% (340) | 14.7% (2,100) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (114) | 18.1% (2,588) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wright vs Scottsbluff
- A higher percentage of residents in Wright have no formal schooling at 9.8% compared to 1.1% in Scottsbluff.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wright hold a high school diploma at 20.5% compared to 14.4% in Scottsbluff.
- More residents in Wright have less than a high school education at 20.7% compared to 14.7% in Scottsbluff.
- In Scottsbluff, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.1% compared to 7.0% in Wright.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.