Demographics details for Worcester, MA vs Hanover park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Worcester, MA vs Hanover park, IL.
Data | Worcester | Hanover park |
---|---|---|
Population | 205,319 | 36,376 |
Median Age | 34.3 years | 34.7 years |
Median Income | $63,011 | $88,460 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Worcester vs Hanover park
- In Worcester, the population is higher at 205,319, compared to 36,376 in Hanover park.
- The median age in Hanover park is higher at 34.7 years, compared to 34.3 years in Worcester.
- Hanover park has a higher median income of $88,460, compared to $63,011 in Worcester.
- In Hanover park, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 29.0% in Worcester.
- Worcester has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Hanover park.
- Hanover park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 4.8% in Worcester.
Demographics
Demographics Worcester vs Hanover park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Worcester | Hanover park |
---|---|---|
Black | 13 | 8 |
White | 44 | 17 |
Asian | 7 | 20 |
Hispanic | 24 | 39 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Worcester vs Hanover park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Worcester at 13% compared to 8% in Hanover park.
- Worcester has a higher percentage of White residents at 44% compared to 17% in Hanover park.
- In Hanover park, the Asian population stands at 20%, greater than 7% in Worcester.
- Hanover park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 24% in Worcester.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hanover park at 15%, compared to 12% in Worcester.
- In Hanover park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Worcester.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Worcester | Hanover park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 13.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 9.9% |
Depression | 23.1% | 16.1% |
Smoking | 17.1% | 13.1% |
Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 16.4% |
Obesity | 34.8% | 30.5% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Worcester vs Hanover park
- More residents in Worcester report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 13.2% in Hanover park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Worcester at 23.1% compared to 16.1% in Hanover park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Worcester at 17.1% compared to 13.1% in Hanover park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hanover park at 16.4% compared to 15.5% in Worcester.
- Obesity rates are higher in Worcester at 34.8% compared to 30.5% in Hanover park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Worcester at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Hanover park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Worcester | Hanover park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (3,577) | 2.1% (758) |
High School Diploma | 15.6% (31,987) | 16.2% (5,894) |
Less than High School | 16.0% (32,925) | 21.1% (7,688) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.5% (44,155) | 18.0% (6,537) |
Education Levels Comparison: Worcester vs Hanover park
- In Hanover park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.7% in Worcester.
- In Hanover park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.2% compared to 15.6% in Worcester.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hanover park at 21.1%, compared to 16.0% in Worcester.
- A higher percentage of residents in Worcester hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.5% compared to 18.0% in Hanover park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.