Demographics details for Worcester, MA vs Fort valley, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Worcester, MA vs Fort valley, GA.
| Data | Worcester | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 205,319 | 8,838 |
| Median Age | 34.3 years | 30.6 years |
| Median Income | $63,011 | $31,807 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 18.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Worcester vs Fort valley
- In Worcester, the population is higher at 205,319, compared to 8,838 in Fort valley.
- Residents in Worcester have a higher median age of 34.3 years compared to 30.6 years in Fort valley.
- Worcester has a higher median income of $63,011 compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Worcester at 29.0% compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort valley at 25%, compared to 12% in Worcester.
- The unemployment rate in Worcester is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.5% in Fort valley.
Demographics
Demographics Worcester vs Fort valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Worcester | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 13 | 70 |
| White | 44 | 18 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 24 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Worcester vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 13% in Worcester.
- Worcester has a higher percentage of White residents at 44% compared to 18% in Fort valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Worcester at 7% compared to 0% in Fort valley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Worcester at 24% compared to 8% in Fort valley.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Worcester at 12% compared to 4% in Fort valley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Worcester and Fort valley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Worcester | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 19.5% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 11.8% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 46.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Worcester vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.7% in Worcester.
- Depression is more prevalent in Worcester at 23.1% compared to 19.5% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 17.1% in Worcester.
- Binge drinking is more common in Worcester at 15.5% compared to 11.8% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 34.8% in Worcester.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort valley at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Worcester.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Worcester | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (3,577) | 3.0% (267) |
| High School Diploma | 15.6% (31,987) | 13.9% (1,226) |
| Less than High School | 16.0% (32,925) | 17.3% (1,527) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.5% (44,155) | 10.8% (954) |
Education Levels Comparison: Worcester vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.7% in Worcester.
- A higher percentage of residents in Worcester hold a high school diploma at 15.6% compared to 13.9% in Fort valley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort valley at 17.3%, compared to 16.0% in Worcester.
- A higher percentage of residents in Worcester hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.5% compared to 10.8% in Fort valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.