Demographics details for Worcester, MA vs Crawfordsville, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Worcester, MA vs Crawfordsville, IN.

Data Worcester Crawfordsville
Population 205,319 16,479
Median Age 34.3 years 36.7 years
Median Income $63,011 $46,918
Married Families 29.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 12% 13%
Unemployment Rate 4.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Worcester vs Crawfordsville

  • In Worcester, the population is higher at 205,319, compared to 16,479 in Crawfordsville.
  • The median age in Crawfordsville is higher at 36.7 years, compared to 34.3 years in Worcester.
  • Worcester has a higher median income of $63,011 compared to $46,918 in Crawfordsville.
  • In Crawfordsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 29.0% in Worcester.
  • The poverty level is higher in Crawfordsville at 13%, compared to 12% in Worcester.
  • The unemployment rate in Worcester is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.5% in Crawfordsville.

Demographics

Demographics Worcester vs Crawfordsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Worcester Crawfordsville
Black 13 1
White 44 84
Asian 7 1
Hispanic 24 8
Two or More Races 12 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Worcester vs Crawfordsville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Worcester at 13% compared to 1% in Crawfordsville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Crawfordsville at 84% compared to 44% in Worcester.
  • The Asian population is larger in Worcester at 7% compared to 1% in Crawfordsville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Worcester at 24% compared to 8% in Crawfordsville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Worcester at 12% compared to 6% in Crawfordsville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Worcester and Crawfordsville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Worcester Crawfordsville
Mental Health Not Good 18.7% 17.7%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 12.9%
Depression 23.1% 26.1%
Smoking 17.1% 21.8%
Binge Drinking 15.5% 16.6%
Obesity 34.8% 37.0%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Worcester vs Crawfordsville

  • More residents in Worcester report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.7% in Crawfordsville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Crawfordsville at 26.1% versus 23.1% in Worcester.
  • Crawfordsville has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 17.1% in Worcester.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Crawfordsville at 16.6% compared to 15.5% in Worcester.
  • Crawfordsville has higher obesity rates at 37.0% compared to 34.8% in Worcester.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crawfordsville at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Worcester.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Worcester Crawfordsville
No Schooling 1.7% (3,577) 0.7% (114)
High School Diploma 15.6% (31,987) 23.1% (3,814)
Less than High School 16.0% (32,925) 19.9% (3,274)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.5% (44,155) 10.4% (1,714)

Education Levels Comparison: Worcester vs Crawfordsville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Worcester have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.7% in Crawfordsville.
  • In Crawfordsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.1% compared to 15.6% in Worcester.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crawfordsville at 19.9%, compared to 16.0% in Worcester.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Worcester hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.5% compared to 10.4% in Crawfordsville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.