Demographics details for Worcester, MA vs Coconut creek, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Worcester, MA vs Coconut creek, FL.

Data Worcester Coconut creek
Population 205,319 57,348
Median Age 34.3 years 42.4 years
Median Income $63,011 $72,740
Married Families 29.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.8 3.2

Population Comparison: Worcester vs Coconut creek

  • In Worcester, the population is higher at 205,319, compared to 57,348 in Coconut creek.
  • The median age in Coconut creek is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 34.3 years in Worcester.
  • Coconut creek has a higher median income of $72,740, compared to $63,011 in Worcester.
  • In Coconut creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 29.0% in Worcester.
  • Worcester has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Coconut creek.
  • The unemployment rate in Worcester is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.2% in Coconut creek.

Demographics

Demographics Worcester vs Coconut creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Worcester Coconut creek
Black 13 15
White 44 39
Asian 7 3
Hispanic 24 27
Two or More Races 12 16
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Worcester vs Coconut creek

  • In Coconut creek, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 13% in Worcester.
  • Worcester has a higher percentage of White residents at 44% compared to 39% in Coconut creek.
  • The Asian population is larger in Worcester at 7% compared to 3% in Coconut creek.
  • Coconut creek has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 24% in Worcester.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coconut creek at 16%, compared to 12% in Worcester.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Worcester and Coconut creek at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Worcester Coconut creek
Mental Health Not Good 18.7% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 9.9%
Depression 23.1% 17.8%
Smoking 17.1% 16.2%
Binge Drinking 15.5% 15.6%
Obesity 34.8% 27.5%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Worcester vs Coconut creek

  • More residents in Worcester report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.4% in Coconut creek.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Worcester at 23.1% compared to 17.8% in Coconut creek.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Worcester at 17.1% compared to 16.2% in Coconut creek.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Coconut creek at 15.6% compared to 15.5% in Worcester.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Worcester at 34.8% compared to 27.5% in Coconut creek.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Worcester at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Coconut creek.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Worcester Coconut creek
No Schooling 1.7% (3,577) 1.4% (831)
High School Diploma 15.6% (31,987) 16.6% (9,506)
Less than High School 16.0% (32,925) 8.9% (5,111)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.5% (44,155) 26.5% (15,196)

Education Levels Comparison: Worcester vs Coconut creek

  • A higher percentage of residents in Worcester have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.4% in Coconut creek.
  • In Coconut creek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.6% compared to 15.6% in Worcester.
  • More residents in Worcester have less than a high school education at 16.0% compared to 8.9% in Coconut creek.
  • In Coconut creek, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.5% compared to 21.5% in Worcester.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.