Demographics details for Worcester, MA vs Chattanooga, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Worcester, MA vs Chattanooga, TN.

Data Worcester Chattanooga
Population 205,319 184,086
Median Age 34.3 years 37.0 years
Median Income $63,011 $57,703
Married Families 29.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 12% 18%
Unemployment Rate 4.8 4.0

Population Comparison: Worcester vs Chattanooga

  • In Worcester, the population is higher at 205,319, compared to 184,086 in Chattanooga.
  • The median age in Chattanooga is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 34.3 years in Worcester.
  • Worcester has a higher median income of $63,011 compared to $57,703 in Chattanooga.
  • In Chattanooga, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 29.0% in Worcester.
  • The poverty level is higher in Chattanooga at 18%, compared to 12% in Worcester.
  • The unemployment rate in Worcester is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.0% in Chattanooga.

Demographics

Demographics Worcester vs Chattanooga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Worcester Chattanooga
Black 13 29
White 44 56
Asian 7 2
Hispanic 24 7
Two or More Races 12 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Worcester vs Chattanooga

  • In Chattanooga, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 13% in Worcester.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Chattanooga at 56% compared to 44% in Worcester.
  • The Asian population is larger in Worcester at 7% compared to 2% in Chattanooga.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Worcester at 24% compared to 7% in Chattanooga.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Worcester at 12% compared to 6% in Chattanooga.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Worcester and Chattanooga at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Worcester Chattanooga
Mental Health Not Good 18.7% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 13.2%
Depression 23.1% 25.9%
Smoking 17.1% 19.5%
Binge Drinking 15.5% 14.5%
Obesity 34.8% 38.1%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Worcester vs Chattanooga

  • More residents in Worcester report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 18.0% in Chattanooga.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Chattanooga at 25.9% versus 23.1% in Worcester.
  • Chattanooga has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 17.1% in Worcester.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Worcester at 15.5% compared to 14.5% in Chattanooga.
  • Chattanooga has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 34.8% in Worcester.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chattanooga at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Worcester.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Worcester Chattanooga
No Schooling 1.7% (3,577) 0.9% (1,744)
High School Diploma 15.6% (31,987) 13.9% (25,521)
Less than High School 16.0% (32,925) 11.8% (21,703)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.5% (44,155) 23.4% (43,030)

Education Levels Comparison: Worcester vs Chattanooga

  • A higher percentage of residents in Worcester have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.9% in Chattanooga.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Worcester hold a high school diploma at 15.6% compared to 13.9% in Chattanooga.
  • More residents in Worcester have less than a high school education at 16.0% compared to 11.8% in Chattanooga.
  • In Chattanooga, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 21.5% in Worcester.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.