Demographics details for Worcester, MA vs Carthage, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Worcester, MA vs Carthage, MS.
Data | Worcester | Carthage |
---|---|---|
Population | 205,319 | 4,813 |
Median Age | 34.3 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $63,011 | $47,722 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 23.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Worcester vs Carthage
- In Worcester, the population is higher at 205,319, compared to 4,813 in Carthage.
- The median age in Carthage is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 34.3 years in Worcester.
- Worcester has a higher median income of $63,011 compared to $47,722 in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Worcester at 29.0% compared to 23.0% in Carthage.
- The poverty level is higher in Carthage at 15%, compared to 12% in Worcester.
- The unemployment rate in Worcester is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.2% in Carthage.
Demographics
Demographics Worcester vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Worcester | Carthage |
---|---|---|
Black | 13 | 45 |
White | 44 | 36 |
Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 24 | 18 |
Two or More Races | 12 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Worcester vs Carthage
- In Carthage, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 13% in Worcester.
- Worcester has a higher percentage of White residents at 44% compared to 36% in Carthage.
- The Asian population is larger in Worcester at 7% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Worcester at 24% compared to 18% in Carthage.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Worcester at 12% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- In Carthage, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Worcester.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Worcester | Carthage |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 15.8% |
Depression | 23.1% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 17.1% | 25.3% |
Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 12.5% |
Obesity | 34.8% | 46.5% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Worcester vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.7% in Worcester.
- Depression is more prevalent in Worcester at 23.1% compared to 21.6% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 17.1% in Worcester.
- Binge drinking is more common in Worcester at 15.5% compared to 12.5% in Carthage.
- Carthage has higher obesity rates at 46.5% compared to 34.8% in Worcester.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carthage at 23.0% compared to 14.0% in Worcester.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Worcester | Carthage |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (3,577) | 3.0% (145) |
High School Diploma | 15.6% (31,987) | 16.7% (806) |
Less than High School | 16.0% (32,925) | 16.9% (811) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.5% (44,155) | 12.1% (583) |
Education Levels Comparison: Worcester vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.7% in Worcester.
- In Carthage, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 15.6% in Worcester.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carthage at 16.9%, compared to 16.0% in Worcester.
- A higher percentage of residents in Worcester hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.5% compared to 12.1% in Carthage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.