Demographics details for Woodward, OK vs Siloam springs, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodward, OK vs Siloam springs, AR.
| Data | Woodward | Siloam springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,789 | 18,654 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 30.1 years |
| Median Income | $54,864 | $59,911 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodward vs Siloam springs
- The population in Siloam springs is higher at 18,654, compared to 11,789 in Woodward.
- Residents in Woodward have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 30.1 years in Siloam springs.
- Siloam springs has a higher median income of $59,911, compared to $54,864 in Woodward.
- In Siloam springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Woodward.
- The poverty level is higher in Siloam springs at 13%, compared to 9% in Woodward.
- Siloam springs has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Woodward.
Demographics
Demographics Woodward vs Siloam springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodward | Siloam springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 76 | 50 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 20 |
| American Indian | 2 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Woodward vs Siloam springs
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Woodward and Siloam springs at 1%.
- Woodward has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 50% in Siloam springs.
- In Siloam springs, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Woodward.
- Siloam springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 14% in Woodward.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Siloam springs at 20%, compared to 7% in Woodward.
- In Siloam springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 2% in Woodward.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodward | Siloam springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 15.0% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 18.9% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 42.6% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodward vs Siloam springs
- In Siloam springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 17.8% in Woodward.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 26.0%.
- Siloam springs has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 18.9% in Woodward.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Woodward and Siloam springs at 14.9%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodward at 42.6% compared to 39.2% in Siloam springs.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodward at 21.0% compared to 13.0% in Siloam springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodward | Siloam springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (75) | 3.7% (681) |
| High School Diploma | 24.1% (2,845) | 13.5% (2,510) |
| Less than High School | 17.3% (2,039) | 17.4% (3,249) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (1,535) | 14.4% (2,680) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodward vs Siloam springs
- In Siloam springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.6% in Woodward.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodward hold a high school diploma at 24.1% compared to 13.5% in Siloam springs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Siloam springs at 17.4%, compared to 17.3% in Woodward.
- In Siloam springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 13.0% in Woodward.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.