Demographics details for Woodward, OK vs New cambria, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodward, OK vs New cambria, KS.
Data | Woodward | New cambria |
---|---|---|
Population | 11,789 | 104 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 30.7 years |
Median Income | $54,864 | $83,601 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Woodward vs New cambria
- In Woodward, the population is higher at 11,789, compared to 104 in New cambria.
- Residents in Woodward have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 30.7 years in New cambria.
- New cambria has a higher median income of $83,601, compared to $54,864 in Woodward.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodward at 35.0% compared to 32.0% in New cambria.
- The poverty level is identical in both Woodward and New cambria at 9%.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Woodward and New cambria at 3.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Woodward vs New cambria provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Woodward | New cambria |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 76 | 96 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 14 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 1 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodward vs New cambria
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodward at 1% compared to 0% in New cambria.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in New cambria at 96% compared to 76% in Woodward.
- In New cambria, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Woodward.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodward at 14% compared to 1% in New cambria.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodward at 7% compared to 1% in New cambria.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Woodward at 2% compared to 0% in New cambria.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Woodward | New cambria |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 14.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 9.2% |
Depression | 26.0% | 20.8% |
Smoking | 18.9% | 16.5% |
Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 20.0% |
Obesity | 42.6% | 33.7% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodward vs New cambria
- More residents in Woodward report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.3% in New cambria.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodward at 26.0% compared to 20.8% in New cambria.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodward at 18.9% compared to 16.5% in New cambria.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in New cambria at 20.0% compared to 14.9% in Woodward.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodward at 42.6% compared to 33.7% in New cambria.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodward at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in New cambria.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Woodward | New cambria |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (75) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 24.1% (2,845) | 18.3% (19) |
Less than High School | 17.3% (2,039) | 3.8% (4) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (1,535) | 8.7% (9) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodward vs New cambria
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodward have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in New cambria.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodward hold a high school diploma at 24.1% compared to 18.3% in New cambria.
- More residents in Woodward have less than a high school education at 17.3% compared to 3.8% in New cambria.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodward hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.0% compared to 8.7% in New cambria.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.