Demographics details for Woodward, OK vs Charleston, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodward, OK vs Charleston, SC.
| Data | Woodward | Charleston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,789 | 153,672 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 36.3 years |
| Median Income | $54,864 | $83,891 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Woodward vs Charleston
- The population in Charleston is higher at 153,672, compared to 11,789 in Woodward.
- The median age in Charleston is higher at 36.3 years, compared to 35.1 years in Woodward.
- Charleston has a higher median income of $83,891, compared to $54,864 in Woodward.
- In Charleston, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 35.0% in Woodward.
- The poverty level is higher in Charleston at 12%, compared to 9% in Woodward.
- Charleston has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.2% in Woodward.
Demographics
Demographics Woodward vs Charleston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodward | Charleston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 18 |
| White | 76 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodward vs Charleston
- In Charleston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 1% in Woodward.
- Woodward has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 71% in Charleston.
- In Charleston, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Woodward.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodward at 14% compared to 5% in Charleston.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodward at 7% compared to 4% in Charleston.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Woodward at 2% compared to 0% in Charleston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodward | Charleston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 18.9% | 13.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 23.0% |
| Obesity | 42.6% | 31.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodward vs Charleston
- More residents in Woodward report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.6% in Charleston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodward at 26.0% compared to 19.6% in Charleston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodward at 18.9% compared to 13.0% in Charleston.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Charleston at 23.0% compared to 14.9% in Woodward.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodward at 42.6% compared to 31.8% in Charleston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodward at 21.0% compared to 9.0% in Charleston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodward | Charleston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (75) | 0.4% (646) |
| High School Diploma | 24.1% (2,845) | 9.1% (13,959) |
| Less than High School | 17.3% (2,039) | 4.3% (6,655) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (1,535) | 39.9% (61,263) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodward vs Charleston
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodward have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodward hold a high school diploma at 24.1% compared to 9.1% in Charleston.
- More residents in Woodward have less than a high school education at 17.3% compared to 4.3% in Charleston.
- In Charleston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.9% compared to 13.0% in Woodward.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.