Demographics details for Woodward, OK vs Bluefield, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodward, OK vs Bluefield, WV.
| Data | Woodward | Bluefield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,789 | 9,408 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 43.9 years |
| Median Income | $54,864 | $45,854 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Woodward vs Bluefield
- In Woodward, the population is higher at 11,789, compared to 9,408 in Bluefield.
- The median age in Bluefield is higher at 43.9 years, compared to 35.1 years in Woodward.
- Woodward has a higher median income of $54,864 compared to $45,854 in Bluefield.
- In Bluefield, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 35.0% in Woodward.
- The poverty level is higher in Bluefield at 12%, compared to 9% in Woodward.
- The unemployment rate in Woodward is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.1% in Bluefield.
Demographics
Demographics Woodward vs Bluefield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodward | Bluefield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 23 |
| White | 76 | 66 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 14 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodward vs Bluefield
- In Bluefield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 1% in Woodward.
- Woodward has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 66% in Bluefield.
- Both Woodward and Bluefield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodward at 14% compared to 3% in Bluefield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bluefield at 8%, compared to 7% in Woodward.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Woodward at 2% compared to 0% in Bluefield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodward | Bluefield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 22.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 15.9% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 28.4% |
| Smoking | 18.9% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 12.0% |
| Obesity | 42.6% | 46.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodward vs Bluefield
- In Bluefield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 17.8% in Woodward.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bluefield at 28.4% versus 26.0% in Woodward.
- Bluefield has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 18.9% in Woodward.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodward at 14.9% compared to 12.0% in Bluefield.
- Bluefield has higher obesity rates at 46.3% compared to 42.6% in Woodward.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bluefield at 27.0% compared to 21.0% in Woodward.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodward | Bluefield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (75) | 0.2% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 24.1% (2,845) | 19.0% (1,788) |
| Less than High School | 17.3% (2,039) | 16.0% (1,505) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (1,535) | 19.4% (1,826) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodward vs Bluefield
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodward have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Bluefield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodward hold a high school diploma at 24.1% compared to 19.0% in Bluefield.
- More residents in Woodward have less than a high school education at 17.3% compared to 16.0% in Bluefield.
- In Bluefield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 13.0% in Woodward.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.